Search Criteria
Package Details: advcpmv 9.5-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/advcpmv.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | advcpmv |
Description: | 'cp' and 'mv' utilities with progress bar patches |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/jarun/advcpmv |
Licenses: | GPL3 |
Provides: | acp, advcp, advmv, amv, cpg, mvg |
Submitter: | ainola |
Maintainer: | Posi |
Last Packager: | Posi |
Votes: | 59 |
Popularity: | 0.97 |
First Submitted: | 2021-12-24 02:06 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-04-27 10:21 (UTC) |
Dependencies (3)
- acl (acl-gitAUR)
- attr (attr-gitAUR)
- glibc (glibc-gitAUR, glibc-linux4AUR, glibc-eacAUR, glibc-eac-binAUR, glibc-eac-rocoAUR)
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last »
ainola commented on 2021-12-24 02:05 (UTC)
It doesn't matter how old the package is, what matters is correct naming. :)
If there's no actual reason for calling this advcp, this should be moved into advcpmv. I will perform a merge.
Posi commented on 2021-12-20 17:05 (UTC) (edited on 2021-12-20 17:05 (UTC) by Posi)
This package is in the AUR since 2012-12-03 17:51 /// I adopted this package one time /// The duplicate advcpmv is in the AUR just since 2020-10-23 19:23
ainola commented on 2021-12-20 16:55 (UTC)
Any reason why this is called "advcp" instead of "advcpmv" as named at https://github.com/jarun/advcpmv ? There's https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/advcpmv/ and we need to remove the duplication somewhere.
simona commented on 2021-11-10 20:42 (UTC)
patch: **** Only garbage was found in the patch input. ==> ERRORE: Si è verificato un errore in prepare().
teke commented on 2021-06-04 13:05 (UTC) (edited on 2022-05-01 10:02 (UTC) by teke)
Bonjour, Un super gros merci pour le paquet!!!!
maximbaz commented on 2020-12-26 16:33 (UTC)
I applied your suggestion to use specific commit. If anyone wants to take over this package, it is still on the table :)
maximbaz commented on 2020-12-26 15:18 (UTC)
I'm not really using this package anymore anyway, would anyone want to maintain?
ouuan commented on 2020-12-26 15:04 (UTC)
As long as it downloads from the master branch, it will break in the future. It should download from a specific commit hash.
maximbaz commented on 2020-12-26 14:51 (UTC)
The hash is correct, please build in a clean environment next time ;)
I'm pushing an update now to prevent user errors like this one in the future.
j1simon commented on 2020-12-26 14:45 (UTC)
Please, test the packages before upload:
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last »