Search Criteria
Package Details: android-platform 35_r02-2
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/android-platform.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | android-platform |
Description: | Android SDK Platform, latest API |
Upstream URL: | http://developer.android.com/sdk/index.html |
Keywords: | android development |
Licenses: | LicenseRef-custom |
Conflicts: | android-platform-35 |
Provides: | android-platform-35 |
Submitter: | lestb |
Maintainer: | g360 (Skycoder42, Vrakfall, Kppqju77, bsndrf) |
Last Packager: | Kppqju77 |
Votes: | 187 |
Popularity: | 0.35 |
First Submitted: | 2013-11-08 12:10 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2025-01-30 20:00 (UTC) |
Dependencies (2)
Required by (12)
- android-desktop-x86-64-system-image
- android-google-apis
- android-google-apis-armv7a-eabi
- android-google-apis-playstore-x86-64-system-image
- android-google-apis-playstore-x86-system-image
- android-google-apis-x86-64-22
- android-google-apis-x86-64-system-image
- android-studio-beta (optional)
- android-x86-64-system-image
- android-x86-system-image
- scrcpy-full-git (make)
- unity-editor-lts-android
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last »
Skycoder42 commented on 2019-06-11 10:26 (UTC)
@Vrakfall I know that platform 29 is out, but AFAIK it is still in beta status? The question is: should we update this package before it gets the official release? I personally think we should at least wait for RC1, but other opinions (especially by the other comaintainers) are welcome.
Vrakfall commented on 2019-06-11 04:22 (UTC)
Also, API 29 is out. I made the package
android-platform-29
if you want to just rip-off the PKGBUILD or I can also co-maintain this one. I haven't addressed theadb
/fastboot
issue there yet as I ran out of time to test it.Vrakfall commented on 2019-06-09 10:33 (UTC) (edited on 2019-06-09 13:16 (UTC) by Vrakfall)
With the added
provides
statement in the official repo'sandroid-tools
package, shouldn't this just requireadb
andfastboot
? Does it even needadb
actually (and technically)?ishitatsuyuki commented on 2018-05-27 15:33 (UTC)
Downloaded three times from two different networks in Japan, and the checksum seems to be working for me. What I can tell from the comments is that either the Google guys seems to be messed up with two different versions of the zip, or maybe it's just a error HTML page.
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last »