Package Details: anki-bin 24.06.3-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/anki-bin.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: anki-bin
Description: Helps you remember facts (like words/phrases in a foreign language) efficiently. Installed with wheel.
Upstream URL: https://apps.ankiweb.net/
Keywords: anki anki-bin
Licenses: AGPL3
Conflicts: anki
Provides: anki
Submitter: Grafcube
Maintainer: escape0707 (Flammkuchen)
Last Packager: Flammkuchen
Votes: 113
Popularity: 3.07
First Submitted: 2021-10-21 08:27 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-07-03 12:54 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next › Last »

yoshi314 commented on 2022-04-09 08:19 (UTC)

2.1.50 is out.

doplis commented on 2022-03-16 11:17 (UTC)

When will the QtWebEngineProcess issue get a real fix?

kotetsu commented on 2022-02-17 12:18 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip @Goetz That fixes the issue.

Goetz commented on 2022-02-16 15:54 (UTC)

This error seems to cover all packages which depend on QtWebEngineProcess. See AUR rstudio-desktop-bin 2021.09.2.382-1 for example. The same solution for rstudio works also for ank anki --no-sandbox.

MisterPresident commented on 2022-02-16 08:11 (UTC) (edited on 2022-02-16 08:41 (UTC) by MisterPresident)

Having the same issue like @Perfi, switched to anki, anki-bin didn't work either :-(

Perfi commented on 2022-02-16 06:03 (UTC)

For the last few days the Anki window has been blank - there's just the "File/Edit/Tools/Help" top menu bar, and the entire window below is empty. Not sure what changed, but switching to https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/anki (and closing my eyes during the whole Basel install... :D) helped for now, which is mostly what I wanted to report here.

kuklinistvan commented on 2022-01-01 12:56 (UTC)

@derivator Thank you for getting in touch, and I wish you and everyone a happy new year! The Docker image is only there to provide an easy way to build the package regardless of the builder's currently used distribution.

I'm not sure if removing small tools aiding the build from this repository is justified, some restructuring could be of use, though.

If you have the time to "emulate" a PR for me (clone the repository, modify its content according to your idea, host it somewhere publicly and share the link), I can review and incorporate your changes.

derivator commented on 2022-01-01 12:47 (UTC)

@kuklinistvan You seem to have included some files in the git repository that are not necessary to build the package. As far as I can tell they're harmless stuff related to building in a docker environment, but I wasn't expecting them and haven't seen any other packages do this, so it seemed unusual and suspicious. I don't know what the AUR-best-practice is, but maybe these files could be removed? Or at least put into a seperate folder with an explanation of what they're for and that they're not necessary to build the package?

Rumpelstilzchen commented on 2021-11-08 16:45 (UTC) (edited on 2021-11-08 16:46 (UTC) by Rumpelstilzchen)

@kuklinistvan :-)

kuklinistvan commented on 2021-11-08 15:17 (UTC)

@Rumpelstilzchen, thanks for the updated patch!

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next › Last »