Package Details: anyk 3.36.0-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/anyk.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: anyk
Description: Form fill program of the Hungarian tax office (Általános Nyomtatványkitöltő (ÁNYK))
Upstream URL: https://www.nav.gov.hu/nav/letoltesek/nyomtatvanykitolto_programok/nyomtatvany_apeh/keretprogramok/abevjava_install.html
Keywords: abevjava adó általános ányk apeh nav nyomtatványkitöltő
Licenses: Apache
Provides: abevjava
Submitter: mark.sagikazar
Maintainer: mark.sagikazar (bence.hornak, norbert.balazs)
Last Packager: norbert.balazs
Votes: 6
Popularity: 0.000015
First Submitted: 2016-02-03 16:50 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-12-17 18:34 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

norbert.balazs commented on 2022-03-12 15:43 (UTC)

Seems like the GID can't be dynamic because of the way the package installation works. I updated it to 569, which is not conflicting with any GID listed here: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/DeveloperWiki:UID_/_GID_Database

From my testing, this change doesn't seem to affect existing installations, but I have a hunch that next the upgrade may not work correctly if you already have the anyk group with GID 169.

In that case, running this + a relogin will fix it:

sudo groupmod -g 569 anyk
sudo chgrp -R 569 "/usr/share/abevjava/abev"
sudo chgrp -R 569 "/usr/share/abevjava/eroforrasok"
sudo chgrp -R 569 "/usr/share/abevjava/nyomtatvanyok"
sudo chgrp -R 569 "/usr/share/abevjava/upgrade"
sudo chgrp -R 569 "/usr/share/abevjava/segitseg"

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 Next › Last »

nagyesz commented on 2022-03-16 08:05 (UTC)

The package does not compile for me, because java8-openjfx does not compile (java 8 should be installed, but java 17 is installed in my system). Checking the change log of Ányk: 2015: minimum java version is 1.8. 2019: works with java 9. I don't see any reason we should stuck with java 8. For me, Ányk compiles and works with the latest java-openjfx (java 17).

norbert.balazs commented on 2022-03-12 15:43 (UTC)

Seems like the GID can't be dynamic because of the way the package installation works. I updated it to 569, which is not conflicting with any GID listed here: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/DeveloperWiki:UID_/_GID_Database

From my testing, this change doesn't seem to affect existing installations, but I have a hunch that next the upgrade may not work correctly if you already have the anyk group with GID 169.

In that case, running this + a relogin will fix it:

sudo groupmod -g 569 anyk
sudo chgrp -R 569 "/usr/share/abevjava/abev"
sudo chgrp -R 569 "/usr/share/abevjava/eroforrasok"
sudo chgrp -R 569 "/usr/share/abevjava/nyomtatvanyok"
sudo chgrp -R 569 "/usr/share/abevjava/upgrade"
sudo chgrp -R 569 "/usr/share/abevjava/segitseg"

labuwx commented on 2022-03-12 05:12 (UTC)

Hi,

The sys group ID (169) is in conflict with transmission-cli. In this case the group is still created but with a different ID.

Could you please pick a different ID, or use chgrp -R anyk ...

norbert.balazs commented on 2022-01-12 21:47 (UTC)

Fixed. Looks like nav messed up the rpm link on their site. The package still has 3.11.0 in the name, but it actually points to 3.12.0.

tombenko commented on 2022-01-12 19:22 (UTC)

==> Making package: anyk 3.11.0-1 (Wed Jan 12 20:22:03 2022) ==> Checking runtime dependencies... ==> Checking buildtime dependencies... ==> Retrieving sources... -> Found abevjava_install-3.11.0-0.1.noarch.rpm -> Found abevjava -> Found abevjavapath.cfg -> Found anyk.desktop -> Found setenv -> Found anyk.sysusers ==> Validating source files with md5sums... abevjava_install-3.11.0-0.1.noarch.rpm ... FAILED abevjava ... Passed abevjavapath.cfg ... Passed anyk.desktop ... Passed setenv ... Passed anyk.sysusers ... Passed ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

mark.sagikazar commented on 2021-02-22 17:56 (UTC)

Frissítettem a csomagot.

Winux11 commented on 2021-02-20 21:58 (UTC)

Sajnos megint nem jó a csomag

mark.sagikazar commented on 2021-01-11 14:03 (UTC)

Nemsokára átállok a világos oldalra megint (aka. lesz Archom), úgyhogy remélhetőleg fogom tudni frissítgetni, de ha bárki beugrana addig, feel free to ping me.

sajo commented on 2021-01-11 13:48 (UTC)

A 2021. január 8-i csomagfrissítés óta nem működik a build.

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 Next › Last »