Package Details: aura 4.0.8-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/aura.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: aura
Description: A package manager for Arch Linux and its AUR
Upstream URL: https://github.com/fosskers/aura
Keywords: AUR pacman rust
Licenses: GPL-3.0-or-later
Conflicts: aura-bin, aura-git, aura3-bin
Submitter: fosskers
Maintainer: fosskers
Last Packager: fosskers
Votes: 170
Popularity: 0.066107
First Submitted: 2012-06-13 09:49 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-09-29 08:02 (UTC)

Dependencies (13)

Required by (2)

Sources (1)

Pinned Comments

fosskers commented on 2024-07-31 10:21 (UTC)

Aura 4 has been released. If instead you wish you keep using the Haskell-based v3 series, please install:

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/aura3-bin

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 .. 40 Next › Last »

purefn commented on 2014-05-07 20:19 (UTC)

By default a very general PKGBUILD will be created from the cabal file, but a patch can be created which will be applied to the PKGBUILD <https://github.com/magthe/cblrepo#adding-patches-for-packages> before any building is done.

fosskers commented on 2014-05-07 20:15 (UTC)

I will do that then. How do I ensure the PKGBUILD habs uses is (close to) the one aura uses now? There are certain directories aura touches (for backups, shell completions, etc) and there is very specific install behaviour in the current PKGBUILD. Hopefully they wouldn't just run `cabal2arch` on what's provided by Hackage, as that often produces overly general PKGBUILDs.

purefn commented on 2014-05-07 19:55 (UTC)

If aura was put on Hackage, then i686 and x86_64 would be created for it. Also, if you keep the version on Hackage up to date, the updates will get propagated to [haskell-core] when the cblrepo.db in habs is sync'd.

fosskers commented on 2014-05-07 19:29 (UTC)

So it seems [haskell-happstack] isn't needed at all anymore. That's great news! The wiki should be edited accordingly. Now, I don't see why aura couldn't be put on Hackage. People would probably feel better about installing `haskell-aura` from [haskell-core] than they would about installing `aura-bin` from here. Also, wouldn't that also generate an i686 binary as well? I'm sure a number of Aura's users would appreciate that.

purefn commented on 2014-05-07 16:46 (UTC)

@fosskers Is there any reason the current version of aura can't be put on Hackage? This would make it much more likely to get added to [haskell-core] as it would fit in with the current build/maintenance system that is being used.

purefn commented on 2014-05-07 16:29 (UTC)

All of the dependencies of aura are in [haskell-core] now.

vendion commented on 2014-05-06 12:59 (UTC)

Looks like I need to visit the Aura wiki page more often, adding [haskell-happstack] supplied the dependencies required to build Aura. Not exactly sure when that was added to the wiki but it works.

purefn commented on 2014-05-06 03:07 (UTC)

If it were on Hackage that would make it much easier. I've got all the current dependencies built locally and am submitting PRs. Now I need to figure out if I can get aura into habs without it being on hackage.

fosskers commented on 2014-05-06 01:06 (UTC)

Well if it's on there that's news to me, haha. I think it being on Hackage would be easiest for the habs guys to release builds of it.

purefn commented on 2014-05-05 23:42 (UTC)

Oh for some reason I thought I had seen aura on hackage in the past. Hopefully that isn't a roadblock to getting it into [haskell-core]