OK, it appears Launchpad gives a slightly different tarball each time you download, so the md5sums are always going to fail.
Anyone know how to deal with that?
Search Criteria
Package Details: backintime 1.5.2-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/backintime.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | backintime |
Description: | Simple backup system inspired from the Flyback Project and TimeVault. Qt5 GUI version. |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/bit-team/backintime |
Licenses: | GPL |
Submitter: | None |
Maintainer: | graysky |
Last Packager: | graysky |
Votes: | 296 |
Popularity: | 0.47 |
First Submitted: | 2009-01-09 20:46 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-08-07 19:55 (UTC) |
Dependencies (11)
- backintime-cliAUR (backintime-cli-gitAUR)
- libnotify (libnotify-gitAUR)
- polkit (polkit-gitAUR, polkit-consolekitAUR)
- python-dbus
- python-pyqt6
- sshfs
- xorg-xdpyinfo
- python (python37AUR, python311AUR, python310AUR) (make)
- kompare (kompare-gitAUR) (optional) – diff/patch frontend
- meld (meld-gitAUR) (optional) – diff/patch frontend
- qt6-translations (optional) – translate BIT dialogs into native language
Required by (1)
- backintime-cli (optional)
Sources (1)
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 .. 73 Next › Last »
fukawi2 commented on 2013-04-03 22:22 (UTC)
fukawi2 commented on 2013-04-03 22:11 (UTC)
Well it appears upstream have adopted the Ubuntu fork, so here's a new PKGBUILD for 1.0.22 :)
kar commented on 2013-02-12 01:23 (UTC)
Ok, I think it's not really necessary, because version 1.0.8 (I use the KDE4 version) is very stable and for me it runs, runs, runs and runs. ;-)
But I don't know, if there are some new features or if it's only for stability- and security-updates.
fukawi2 commented on 2013-02-11 22:45 (UTC)
It seems Ubuntu have forked BIT since upstream dev seems to have come to a halt. I'm unsure if we should switch to track the Ubuntu version or not...
kar commented on 2013-02-11 15:09 (UTC)
I'm not sure, but I think the package is (maybe) outdated?!
On the website http://backintime.le-web.org/download_page/ is only version 1.0.8 available, but on Launchpad ( https://launchpad.net/~bit-team/+archive/stable ) is for Ubuntu version 1.0.20 available.
fukawi2 commented on 2013-01-01 06:28 (UTC)
@coderkun Because I'm not a TU, and obviously none of the current TU's have an interest in picking it up.
coderkun commented on 2012-12-31 12:05 (UTC)
Why is BackInTime not in the official repos?—all dependencies are.
capoeira commented on 2012-11-04 08:44 (UTC)
anybody got backups working with a systemd timer (without cron)?
fukawi2 commented on 2012-10-28 22:14 (UTC)
Added in pkgrel 5
https://github.com/fukawi2/aur-packages/commit/06212232a9e16e1de323218fa1e5a51508e45293
mrbit commented on 2012-10-28 18:53 (UTC)
please add conflict backintime-kde4
Pinned Comments
graysky commented on 2023-10-07 12:15 (UTC)
Using an AUR helper such as yay to build packages including backintime is HIGHLY discouraged. The recommended build method is to use a clean chroot. See: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/DeveloperWiki:Building_in_a_clean_chroot
I wrote a script that automates much of that called clean-chroot-manager offered here in the AUR.
Please stop posting build failures because you insist on building with yay or other AUR helpers.