Thanks again for the help and being receptive to feedback!
Search Criteria
Package Details: bazelisk-bin 1.25.0-1
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/bazelisk-bin.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | bazelisk-bin |
| Description: | A user-friendly launcher for Bazel |
| Upstream URL: | https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazelisk |
| Keywords: | bazel bazelisk build skylark starlark |
| Licenses: | Apache-2.0 |
| Conflicts: | bazel, bazelisk |
| Provides: | bazel, bazelisk |
| Submitter: | sudoforge |
| Maintainer: | FantasqueX |
| Last Packager: | FantasqueX |
| Votes: | 4 |
| Popularity: | 0.001002 |
| First Submitted: | 2020-02-07 10:55 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2024-12-19 02:13 (UTC) |
Dependencies (0)
Required by (63)
- bazel-buildtools (requires bazel) (make)
- bazel-compilation-database (requires bazel)
- buildstream-plugins-experimental (requires bazel)
- cilium-git (requires bazel) (make)
- deepspeech (requires bazel) (make)
- deepspeech-git (requires bazel) (make)
- emacs-mozc (requires bazel) (make)
- emacs-mozc-ut-full (requires bazel) (make)
- emacs-mozc-with-jp-dict (requires bazel) (make)
- fcitx-mozc-ut (requires bazel) (make)
- fcitx5-mozc-ext-neologd (requires bazel) (make)
- fcitx5-mozc-ut (requires bazel) (make)
- fcitx5-mozc-ut-full (requires bazel) (make)
- fcitx5-mozc-with-jp-dict (requires bazel) (make)
- google-lyra (requires bazel) (make)
- google-lyra-git (requires bazel) (make)
- ibazel (requires bazel)
- ibazel (requires bazel) (make)
- ibazel-git (requires bazel)
- ibus-mozc (requires bazel) (make)
- Show 43 more...
Sources (1)
Latest Comments
uhthomas commented on 2023-10-11 13:32 (UTC)
FantasqueX commented on 2023-10-11 13:31 (UTC)
Maybe in some cases users need bazelisk specifically. Your suggestions are reasonable. Thanks. I have updated the package.
uhthomas commented on 2023-10-11 13:13 (UTC)
Thanks! :) It may also be worth updating the 'provides' section to include 'bazelisk'?
FantasqueX commented on 2023-10-11 02:27 (UTC)
I have readded bazel as provides referring to official brew package. Thanks for your suggestions! @uhthomas
uhthomas commented on 2023-10-11 01:09 (UTC)
I feel like it would be better to install this tool as 'bazel', as is convention in the Bazel community.
https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazelisk/blob/89e6693df1e9a9d49fe95f2814d7139d258a2f2c/README.md
Install it as the bazel binary in your PATH (e.g. copy it to /usr/local/bin/bazel). Never worry about upgrading Bazel to the latest version again.
This is also how the official 'setup-bazelisk' GitHub action works.
https://github.com/bazelbuild/setup-bazelisk
There has also been discussion of adding both for this package in the past.
FantasqueX commented on 2023-10-10 02:07 (UTC)
Hi! Sorry for breaking changes without prior notice. The README of bazelisk just uses bazelisk instead of bazel. I think this package should only provide bazelisk instead of bazel.
uhthomas commented on 2023-10-09 23:38 (UTC) (edited on 2023-10-09 23:39 (UTC) by uhthomas)
Hi! The new version installs the binary as bazelisk rather than bazel, which is a bit inconvenient and unexpected. Is it possible to revert this behaviour change? I imagine this will also break existing users of the package, and dependencies which depend on 'bazel' as that is what this package is named in the 'provides' section.
Pinned Comments