Search Criteria
Package Details: brunsli 0.1-2
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/brunsli.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | brunsli |
Description: | Lossless JPEG repacker |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/google/brunsli/ |
Licenses: | MIT |
Submitter: | dbermond |
Maintainer: | dbermond |
Last Packager: | dbermond |
Votes: | 4 |
Popularity: | 0.69 |
First Submitted: | 2020-02-01 01:43 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2022-11-14 14:27 (UTC) |
Dependencies (3)
- gcc-libs (gcc-libs-gitAUR, gccrs-libs-gitAUR, gcc11-libsAUR, gcc-libs-snapshotAUR)
- cmake (cmake-gitAUR) (make)
- git (git-gitAUR, git-glAUR) (make)
Latest Comments
micwoj92 commented on 2025-02-27 01:52 (UTC)
I didn't even see other changes. I just glanced over it...
Would you be interested in changing to system binaries if it works? For me the biggest gripe with this is unnecessary download size for these additional repos.
dbermond commented on 2025-02-26 16:00 (UTC)
@micwoj92 Simply dropping a patch without any explanation or context is not a good practice, and usually will be ignored. That being said, I do not like this patch, as it changes the C/C++ compiler, disables upstream CXX extensions, and so on. Besides, not sure if it is a good idea to exchange a source brotli/gtest for a binary brotli/gtest in a project that does not see a single upstream commit in one year and have no new upstream releases in six years. I prefer to stay with upstream sources currently, unless these sources become broken with newer versions of compiler and/or cmake.
micwoj92 commented on 2025-02-25 23:45 (UTC)
@dbermond could you take a look at patch below to use system packages?
entshuld commented on 2024-05-07 15:30 (UTC)