Search Criteria
Package Details: bugwarrior 1.8.0-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/bugwarrior.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | bugwarrior |
Description: | pull issues from issue trackers into taskwarrior (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, etc.) |
Upstream URL: | https://bugwarrior.readthedocs.io |
Licenses: | GPL3 |
Conflicts: | bugwarrior-git |
Submitter: | wookietreiber |
Maintainer: | Arvedui |
Last Packager: | Arvedui |
Votes: | 9 |
Popularity: | 0.000000 |
First Submitted: | 2017-02-21 14:26 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2020-12-13 20:31 (UTC) |
Dependencies (21)
- python (python37AUR, python311AUR, python310AUR)
- python-click
- python-dateutil
- python-dogpile.cache
- python-future
- python-jinja
- python-lockfile
- python-pytz
- python-requests
- python-setuptools
- python-six
- python-taskwAUR (python-taskw-ngAUR)
- python-bugzillaAUR (optional) – bugzilla support
- python-debianbtsAUR (optional) – bts support
- python-google-api-python-client (optional) – gmail support
- python-jiraAUR (optional) – jira support
- python-keyring (optional) – keyring support
- python-oauth2client (optional) – gmail support
- python-offtrac (optional) – Trac support
- python-phabricatorAUR (optional) – phabricator support
- python-pysimplesoapAUR (optional) – bts support
Required by (1)
- timewarrior-jirapush (optional)
Latest Comments
1 2 Next › Last »
Arvedui commented on 2020-04-13 08:54 (UTC)
Yes, of course. Thank your for bringing this to my attention!
I added other optdepends as well, some are still missing because they are not packaged at all for arch right now. I made a todo item to fix that.
tjaart commented on 2020-04-13 01:13 (UTC)
I think this package should optionally depend on
python-jira
for jira supportrvasilev commented on 2017-12-10 08:47 (UTC)
wrong sha256sum.
should be
ab03c3872e8f27f954b60bb6ff4f0646a2b7e2a7fb9c12116a90cdc297b4b34f
Foxboron commented on 2017-12-09 23:31 (UTC) (edited on 2017-12-09 23:32 (UTC) by Foxboron)
Yes, I saw it now :p Missed that one.
Pushed and should be without errors. Please feel free to yell if you spot anything.
rvasilev commented on 2017-12-09 16:43 (UTC) (edited on 2017-12-09 17:02 (UTC) by rvasilev)
The second
package()
should be install()?... My bad. The 1st package() should be build()
Foxboron commented on 2017-12-09 15:01 (UTC)
Something strange with the setup.py when utilizing python3, the egg-info is inserted but the module is missing.
Don't have time to investigate this today, so incase anyone else wants to take a look:
rvasilev commented on 2017-12-08 12:40 (UTC)
omitting setup.py dependency check is also a workaround with potential to brake the build.
even
python3 setup.py install --optimize=1
is installingfuture-0.15
. is it a bug or a feature?so, you as maintainer can do both - make it up to date and working, or leave it broken and wait until all upstreams/AUR dependencies will be fixed
just for reference
Foxboron commented on 2017-12-08 11:38 (UTC)
If you read what i wrote you'd realize that setup.py dependency check can be omitted. The bug that happens with future is a python2 regression.
taskw will be fixed whenever I accept the orphan request.
rvasilev commented on 2017-12-08 11:34 (UTC) (edited on 2017-12-08 11:39 (UTC) by rvasilev)
not everything is solved with python3
even if upstream will be fixed, it will not 'just build' with AUR dependencies as of now.
i see number of options, choose one of them:
1 Ideal linux-way with python3:
python-taskw
that is absent in AURpython-future-0.15
to workaround2 Ideal linux-way with python2:
python2-taskw
python2-future-0.15
to workaround3 My linux-way with python2:
setup.py
to unpin version frompython2-future
python2-taskw
4 My python2-3 way:
the last one is the fastest and more future proof until all the fixes will be accepted to upstream/AUR. and it will just work.
Foxboron commented on 2017-12-08 10:38 (UTC)
Looking at this, it's only a python2 problem. Everything is solved by migrating to python3.
1 2 Next › Last »