Package Details: clean-chroot-manager 2.230-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/clean-chroot-manager.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: clean-chroot-manager
Description: Wrapper for managing clean chroot builds with local repo therein.
Upstream URL: https://github.com/graysky2/clean-chroot-manager
Licenses: MIT
Conflicts: clean_chroot_manager
Replaces: clean_chroot_manager
Submitter: graysky
Maintainer: graysky
Last Packager: graysky
Votes: 66
Popularity: 1.17
First Submitted: 2013-08-18 16:52 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-09-29 11:18 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 .. 10 Next › Last »

graysky commented on 2019-10-10 19:09 (UTC)

@gill - Yes, it should be fixed. Can you nuke your build root and try again?

gillecaluim commented on 2019-10-10 18:57 (UTC)

I'm still getting the same problem with stat /repo. System is up to date, devtools = 20190912-1, clean-chroot-manager = 2.97-1 I can build the first package ok, but after that I get Failed to stat /repo You seemed to close the discussion on the github page as if this problem was fixed? If so, how can I fix this?

graysky commented on 2019-09-04 16:49 (UTC) (edited on 2019-09-07 11:35 (UTC) by graysky)

Do you mind taking this to the issue section on github so we don't pollute the AUR page with comments? Steps to reproduce there will be helpful for me to see what you're seeing.

EDIT: https://github.com/graysky2/clean-chroot-manager/issues/57

adsun commented on 2019-09-04 16:30 (UTC) (edited on 2019-09-04 16:31 (UTC) by adsun)

@graysky I nuked the existing chroot: while it works when initially building a first package, the "stat" error starts occurring after the package is added to the repo directory of the chroot for the first time.

adsun commented on 2019-09-04 13:32 (UTC) (edited on 2019-09-04 13:34 (UTC) by adsun)

This needs to be fixed with the new devtools version 20190821. Otherwise: 

Failed to stat /repo: No such file or directory

xuanruiqi commented on 2019-06-17 00:04 (UTC)

The new release now supports chroots on Btrfs!

graysky commented on 2019-01-20 10:10 (UTC) (edited on 2019-01-20 10:10 (UTC) by graysky)

@jtmb - If you follow Arch upstream, update to match.

https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/commit/trunk?h=packages/pacman&id=c81d3556e03d4b3da79779a4804ba8bf8b127cb3

https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/54736

jtmb commented on 2019-01-19 23:00 (UTC)

I did a little cursory googling, but I was curious the reasoning in updating the CFLAGS in 2.93. Should I update my conf to match the skel? any advantages/disadvantages that we're looking at?

graysky commented on 2018-12-11 04:17 (UTC)

@dmp1ce - I just used the nodev option and I get no errors:

tmpfs  /scratch  tmpfs size=27G,nodev  0  0

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 .. 10 Next › Last »