Search Criteria
Package Details: cutelyst 4.3.0-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/cutelyst.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | cutelyst |
Description: | A Web Framework built on top of Qt |
Upstream URL: | http://cutelyst.org |
Keywords: | mvc web |
Licenses: | LGPL |
Submitter: | majewsky |
Maintainer: | sxw |
Last Packager: | sxw |
Votes: | 5 |
Popularity: | 0.000000 |
First Submitted: | 2014-12-27 17:02 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-04-29 11:17 (UTC) |
Dependencies (7)
- grantlee (grantlee-gitAUR)
- qt6-base (qt6-base-headlessAUR, qt6-base-gitAUR)
- cmake (cmake-gitAUR) (make)
- doxygen (doxygen-gitAUR, doxygen-yapAUR) (make)
- graphviz (make)
- pkgconf (pkgconf-gitAUR) (make)
- qt6-tools (make)
Latest Comments
1 2 3 Next › Last »
sxw commented on 2022-04-08 21:40 (UTC)
@And1G Done
And1G commented on 2022-04-03 13:36 (UTC)
Cutelyst provides Qt Creator integration, but you have to manually copy the files. Could you add these two lines to package_cutelyst()?
gdamjan commented on 2021-07-07 17:17 (UTC)
this'll break my https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/virtlyst/ package now I guess
sxw commented on 2021-07-06 12:14 (UTC)
Cutelyst 3 got released. Unfortunately it does not build with the uwsgi plugin turned on and Grantlee/Cutelee have not seen an update to build with Qt6 yet. So I guess we have to wait for upstream or somebody has to create a cutelyst-qt5 package or something.
gdamjan commented on 2021-07-05 23:42 (UTC)
or (found a better way)
just add
to the cmake options
gdamjan commented on 2021-07-05 21:02 (UTC)
Hi, when building the package on an Arch systemd that also has qt6 installed, but grantlee 5.2.0-3 too - the cmake fails with:
ie, it first selects Qt6, but then conflicts with grantlee depending on Qt5.
I've had to add the following patch:
sxw commented on 2018-11-13 18:28 (UTC)
Done
lilmike commented on 2018-11-13 02:57 (UTC)
Package should probably makedepend on pkgconf, since cmake refuses to build without it.
sxw commented on 2018-05-05 20:43 (UTC)
@gdamjan Thx, sorry. I wasn't sure if the uwsgi plugin was dropped in favour of the cutelyst-wsgi tool.
gdamjan commented on 2018-05-03 12:31 (UTC)
maybe the PLUGIN_UWSGI should be enabled too? (since the package already depends on it)
1 2 3 Next › Last »