AUR (en) - davinci-resolve-studio

Search Criteria

Enter search criteria

Search by

Keywords

Out of Date

Sort by

Sort order

Per page

Package Details: davinci-resolve-studio 19.1.4-1

Package Actions

Git Clone URL:	https://aur.archlinux.org/davinci-resolve-studio.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base:	davinci-resolve-studio
Description:	Professional A/V post-production software suite from Blackmagic Design. Studio edition, requires license key or license dongle.
Upstream URL:	https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/support/family/davinci-resolve-and-fusion
Keywords:	blackmagic davinci editor resolve studio video
Licenses:	LicenseRef-Commercial
Conflicts:	davinci-resolve, davinci-resolve-beta, davinci-resolve-studio-beta
Submitter:	codibit
Maintainer:	Muflone
Last Packager:	Muflone
Votes:	45
Popularity:	2.33
First Submitted:	2018-01-21 18:37 (UTC)
Last Updated:	2025-03-22 16:28 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

Muflone commented on 2025-01-26 02:15 (UTC)

IMPORTANT!

Since version 19.1.3-2 this package will not download automatically the source file from the upstream site.

To build this package you will need to manually download the file from https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/support/family/davinci-resolve-and-fusion and place it in the same directory with the PKGBUILD.

This would reduce the mess in this package, making it more readable and clear. Also bypassing the required information from the upstream URL is not allowed in an automated way.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 .. 26 Next › Last »

Bink commented on 2024-07-25 05:44 (UTC)

The output there appears normal @alexmurkoff. I get the same thing, and it is starting here. It would seem to be a local issue.

alexmurkoff commented on 2024-07-25 05:14 (UTC)

Hey, installed Resolve via this package some time ago. It was working up until some moment, but I'm not sure which exactly... Anyone have any info on that? Did it randomly stop working for anyone else after a package update?

$ /opt/resolve/bin/resolve 
ActCCMessage Already in Table: Code= c005, Mode= 13, Level=  1, CmdKey= -1, Option= 0
ActCCMessage Already in Table: Code= c006, Mode= 13, Level=  1, CmdKey= -1, Option= 0
ActCCMessage Already in Table: Code= c007, Mode= 13, Level=  1, CmdKey= -1, Option= 0
ActCCMessage Already in Table: Code= 2282, Mode=  0, Level=  0, CmdKey= 8, Option= 0
PnlMsgActionStringAdapter Already in Table: Code= 615e, Mode=  0, Level=  0, CmdKey= -1, Option= 0
18.6.6.0007 Linux/Clang x86_64
Main thread starts: B76A9000
0x740cb76a9000 | Undefined            | INFO  | 2024-07-25 12:12:58,278 | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0x740cb76a9000 | Undefined            | INFO  | 2024-07-25 12:12:58,278 | Loaded log config from /home/alex/.local/share/DaVinciResolve/configs/log-conf.xml
0x740cb76a9000 | Undefined            | INFO  | 2024-07-25 12:12:58,278 | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

artemklevtsov commented on 2024-06-29 04:36 (UTC)

Package still broken. Fix please.

Tecnio commented on 2024-06-24 14:18 (UTC)

Can confirm commenting out line 193 resolves the issue.

Seeed commented on 2024-06-19 04:40 (UTC)

I can confirm that commenting out line 193 in the PKGBUILD worked for me as well.

ferda commented on 2024-06-18 06:40 (UTC)

Commenting out line 193 in the PKGBUILD results in a successful build.

lou commented on 2024-06-18 03:14 (UTC)

I am having the same problem as ferda also.

urbenlegend commented on 2024-06-18 02:58 (UTC)

I am having the same problem as ferda.

mv: cannot stat '/home/user/.cache/paru/clone/davinci-resolve-studio/src/squashfs-root/libs/libc++.so.1': No such file or directory

ferda commented on 2024-06-17 21:43 (UTC) (edited on 2024-06-17 21:43 (UTC) by ferda)

The new PKGBUILD fails for me, error message src/squashfs-root/libs/libc++.so.1 l.184 and l.193 appear to be duplicates.

FraYoshi commented on 2024-06-06 05:18 (UTC) (edited on 2024-06-17 21:14 (UTC) by FraYoshi)

Hi J193782456, Might be a problem of permissions, /opt/resolve/.license should be rw for the user during activation.. or the activation has to happen as root. I suggest doing a chown , activate, and reown to root afterwards.

Hope this to solve the problem :)