Package Details: davinci-resolve 19.1.4-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/davinci-resolve.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: davinci-resolve
Description: Professional A/V post-production software suite from Blackmagic Design
Upstream URL: https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/support/family/davinci-resolve-and-fusion
Keywords: blackmagic davinci editor resolve video
Licenses: LicenseRef-Commercial
Conflicts: davinci-resolve-beta, davinci-resolve-studio, davinci-resolve-studio-beta
Submitter: jonathon
Maintainer: Muflone
Last Packager: Muflone
Votes: 152
Popularity: 4.09
First Submitted: 2017-04-19 20:57 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-03-22 03:49 (UTC)

Dependencies (25)

Required by (0)

Sources (1)

Pinned Comments

Muflone commented on 2025-01-26 00:55 (UTC)

IMPORTANT!

Since version 19.1.3-2 this package will not download automatically the source file from the upstream site.

To build this package you will need to manually download the file from https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/support/family/davinci-resolve-and-fusion and place it in the same directory with the PKGBUILD.

This would reduce the mess in this package, making it more readable and clear. Also bypassing the required information from the upstream URL is not allowed in an automated way.

satriani commented on 2021-05-15 14:14 (UTC)

Issues and bugs, please report on the official forum here: https://forum.blackmagicdesign.com/viewforum.php?f=21&sid=239f0d5c49abe5d6a635b69638192e9a Thank you!

Visit DaVinci Resolve - ArchWiki before installing: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/DaVinci_Resolve

ATTENTION: Please don't flag this package as out-of-date before beta version has been released as stable!

This is a current stable Package!

The current free beta is available here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/davinci-resolve-beta/

And for current studio beta here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/davinci-resolve-studio-beta/

Thanks.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 .. 60 Next › Last »

FabioLolix commented on 2022-11-15 07:14 (UTC)

The reccomended command for getting the checksum is updpkgsums

wilaze131 commented on 2022-11-15 07:11 (UTC)

@hyun007 can you share the working checksum number here?

hyun007 commented on 2022-11-15 03:10 (UTC)

Looks like the sha256 checksum is different than the file that's actually downloaded. i downloaded the zip file from the website, and manually ran the checksum sha256sum DaVinci_Resolve_18.1_Linux.zip and checked it against the zip file downloaded in the cache. they matched. so i updated the PKGBUILD file with the manually generated checksum, and then ran makepkg -si

hope this helps

--hyun

wilaze131 commented on 2022-11-14 03:03 (UTC)

@mozzribo i got the same problem.

mozzribo commented on 2022-11-13 19:32 (UTC) 

==> Retrieving sources...
  -> Found DaVinci_Resolve_18.1_Linux.zip
==> Validating source files with sha256sums...
    DaVinci_Resolve_18.1_Linux.zip ... FAILED
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!
Failed to build davinci-resolve

formTy commented on 2022-11-13 06:49 (UTC) (edited on 2022-11-13 06:50 (UTC) by formTy) 

yay -S davinci-resolve

 ...
 ==> Retrieving sources...
   -> Found DaVinci_Resolve_18.1_Linux.zip
 ==> Validating source files with sha256sums...
     DaVinci_Resolve_18.1_Linux.zip ... FAILED
 ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!
  -> error downloading sources: davinci-resolve 
     context: exit status 1

buggs commented on 2022-11-12 21:04 (UTC)

I get a checksum error: a8bfd0f2236c5859b2e31ed2e771de3c326ea5ae6bbf9e442d1d6dacc3a3a0e6 .cache/paru/clone/davinci-resolve/DaVinci_Resolve_18.1_Linux.zip

FabioLolix commented on 2022-11-09 22:38 (UTC)

Hello, qt5-webkit is being deprecated in Arch repo and this pkgbuild depends both on qt5-webkit and qt5-webengine, worth trying if it works without qt5-webkit https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/arch-dev-public@lists.archlinux.org/thread/Z3YJQFKJT3AXDTI33SBU52C6JK75GL5X/

yar commented on 2022-10-05 16:52 (UTC)

This conflicts with blackmagic-raw-sdk but it doesn't have to. You should not be installing blackmagicraw-player.desktop or blackmagicraw-speedtest.desktop, let the other package do that.

nilsw commented on 2022-09-15 15:31 (UTC) (edited on 2022-09-16 17:03 (UTC) by nilsw)

I took some time to port the PKGBUILD over to use --appimage-extract. The most important changes are

  • --appimage-extract is used. It does not touch any files outside ${srcdir} and thereby doesn't mess up the system during package creation
  • all the modifications and patching in ${srcdir} is done in prepare()
  • all files are moved over in to ${pkgdir} in package(). No patching is done here
  • Most of the logic in davinci-resolve.install was unneccessarily patching existing files in the system or running updaters that can be replaced by pacman hooks. The patching isn't necessary because of the appdir-extract method, and the updaters are now in the dependencies, so none of it was necessary anymore.
  • Removed the ~/Downloads logic as it was not free of side-effect and not good practice. If you just name the file in source=() and the file already exists in the working directory, download will be skipped automatically.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 .. 60 Next › Last »