Package Details: davinci-resolve 19.0.3-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/davinci-resolve.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: davinci-resolve
Description: Professional A/V post-production software suite from Blackmagic Design
Upstream URL: https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/support/family/davinci-resolve-and-fusion
Keywords: blackmagic davinci editor resolve video
Licenses: Commercial
Conflicts: davinci-resolve-beta, davinci-resolve-studio, davinci-resolve-studio-beta
Submitter: jonathon
Maintainer: satriani
Last Packager: satriani
Votes: 142
Popularity: 2.49
First Submitted: 2017-04-19 20:57 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-10-22 20:37 (UTC)

Dependencies (24)

Required by (0)

Sources (1)

Pinned Comments

satriani commented on 2021-05-15 14:15 (UTC) (edited on 2021-05-15 14:16 (UTC) by satriani)

Issues and bugs, please report on the official forum here: https://forum.blackmagicdesign.com/viewforum.php?f=21&sid=239f0d5c49abe5d6a635b69638192e9a Thank you!

Visit DaVinci Resolve - ArchWiki before installing: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/DaVinci_Resolve

ATTENTION: Please don't flag this package as out-of-date before beta version has been released as stable!

This is a current stable Package!

The current free beta is available here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/davinci-resolve-beta/

And for current studio beta here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/davinci-resolve-studio-beta/

Thanks.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 .. 56 Next › Last »

satriani commented on 2019-10-28 11:34 (UTC) (edited on 2019-10-28 11:45 (UTC) by satriani)

Source file for DaVinci_Resolve_16.1_Linux.zip is expired.

Someone can confirm it? I'm not. It works great for me.

fmeow commented on 2019-10-24 02:11 (UTC)

Source file for DaVinci_Resolve_16.1_Linux.zip is expired.

satriani commented on 2019-10-21 09:52 (UTC)

With this new version, you no longer need to download the ZIP file from the Blackmagic Design website. The script does it automatically.

DJ9 commented on 2019-10-18 00:59 (UTC)

The latest free version I grabbed is DaVinci_Resolve_16.1_Linux.zip which won't install for some reason. The file was in my downloads directory, which failed to find the file, and I also copied it the the /var/pamac-build-DJ9/davinci-resolve directory, and nothing. It was insisting on 16.0. ?

c3n21 commented on 2019-09-22 20:52 (UTC)

I actually get this error:

/opt/resolve/bin/resolve: error while loading shared libraries: libcudart.so.10.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

I've already installed cuda-10.1.243-1 package and exported LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/cuda/lib64 but it's no use

Juicebox commented on 2019-08-28 16:42 (UTC)

@pegasusearl You need to download Davinci Resolve from their website and place it in your Downloads directory or in your pamac build directory. It says it right above the "==>Making package" line.

pegasusearl commented on 2019-08-27 04:32 (UTC) (edited on 2019-08-27 05:49 (UTC) by pegasusearl)

Using Pamac I got this output:

==> Making package: davinci-resolve 16.0-2 (Tue 27 Aug 2019 11:25:56 AM WIB)
==> Checking runtime dependencies...
==> Checking buildtime dependencies...
==> Retrieving sources...
==> ERROR: DaVinci_Resolve_16.0_Linux.zip was not found in the build directory and is not a URL.

ChristophWurst commented on 2019-08-25 15:10 (UTC)

This currently gives me

failed to prepare transaction (conflicting dependencies: davinci-resolve)

on update or installation. The PKGBUILD should list "davinci-resolve-beta" as conflict and not "davinci-resolve" itself.

Building the package manually (without pacaur in this case) worked fine, though.

nixit commented on 2019-08-16 20:39 (UTC) (edited on 2019-08-16 20:40 (UTC) by nixit)

Just installed the latest davinci-resolve 16.0-2. I noticed line 25 in the pkgbuild still references the beta version:

"if [ ${pkgname} == "davinci-resolve-studio-beta" ]; then"

Not sure if this was missed.

funnyprun commented on 2019-08-15 16:52 (UTC)

Hello, this package is working very good aside from an issue where I am unable to input Japanse characters in the textboxes. I'm using fcitx-mozc and fcitx-diagnose tool reports no problems with qt5 nor gtk2. So, I'm a bit confused as to what is causing this problem. I would appreciate any help!

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 .. 56 Next › Last »