Package Details: dxvk-bin 2.5.3-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/dxvk-bin.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: dxvk-bin
Description: A Vulkan-based compatibility layer for Direct3D 9/10/11 which allows running 3D applications on Linux using Wine (Windows DLL binary files)
Upstream URL: https://github.com/doitsujin/dxvk
Keywords: dxvk
Licenses: zlib/libpng
Conflicts: d9vk, dxvk
Provides: d9vk, dxvk
Submitter: ssorgatem
Maintainer: ssorgatem (kekonn)
Last Packager: kekonn
Votes: 229
Popularity: 1.70
First Submitted: 2018-03-02 07:39 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-01-14 08:30 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

ssorgatem commented on 2018-03-27 06:47 (UTC) (edited on 2019-02-26 12:20 (UTC) by ssorgatem)

To enable DXVK in a wineprefix, do the following (with the WINEPREFIX variable properly set):

setup_dxvk install

In order to uninstall DXVK from a wineprefix:

setup_dxvk uninstall

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 16 Next › Last »

loathingkernel commented on 2024-09-27 14:33 (UTC) (edited on 2024-09-27 14:35 (UTC) by loathingkernel)

They are correct that the old upstream script doesn't work if wine has been built using the new wow64 wine mode. Feel free to take the updated script from dxvk-mingw AUR package.

ssorgatem commented on 2024-09-27 07:29 (UTC)

@Piroro-hs the setup script is working as expected for me, both with and without the "--symlink" option. The x32 libraries are put in c:/windows/syswow64/

Piroro-hs commented on 2024-09-26 19:35 (UTC) (edited on 2024-09-26 19:39 (UTC) by Piroro-hs)

The setup_vxdk script plays poorly with wow64 wine. It copies x64 dlls to C:\windows\system32 then overwrite those with x32 dlls.

kekonn commented on 2024-07-12 15:53 (UTC)

@Lili1228: should be fixed now

Lili1228 commented on 2024-07-12 07:27 (UTC)

Please update setup_dxvk to include d3d8.dll that was added in 2.4.

Mikaka commented on 2024-04-05 13:07 (UTC)

@markboston, isn't it marked out of date because this is 2.3-1 not 2.3.1-1?

markboston commented on 2024-03-31 19:20 (UTC)

not sure why this was marked out of date. somehow i think the dates got messed up because 2.3.1 only just came out.

begin-theadventu commented on 2024-03-15 13:17 (UTC) (edited on 2024-03-15 13:50 (UTC) by begin-theadventu)

Proposal: p̶k̶g̶b̶a̶s̶e̶, license: zlib-acknowledgement, source for setup_dxvk.sh (last commit before it got removed), 17->16, package_dxvk-bin -> package

loathingkernel commented on 2023-02-13 08:19 (UTC)

@ssorgatem

The moment a change needs to be done to it (which will eventually come)

That script has largely remained the same for the lifetime of the dxvk project. There have been updates, some contributed by myself, but there all were improving robustness. None of them has changed the functionality itself. Given this history, I find it highly unlikely for it to require any change that isn't as simple as a sed command.

But it leads to code duplication between the several DXVK packages.

You are substituting a 2-line addition to 5 package, with the creation of a new package and the updating of the same 5 packages to list it as a dependency. Even if I don't elect to use that -common, because of fear that the maintainer of it might not respond in time when the aforementioned need for changes might occur, I will still need to update my packages to conflict with the -common package. Therefore I still believe it is unnecessary inconvenience and pollution.

-common packages in repos are usually reserved for larger size assets, not 5KiB scripts.

ssorgatem commented on 2023-01-26 08:53 (UTC)

@loathignkernel using the static link for the file before that commit or just a patch reverting that commit only allows us to use the script unmodified. The moment a change needs to be done to it (which will eventually come) we'd need to drop that and at the very least include the file itself as a source file. So between reverting the commit and providing our own file, only the latter is future-proof.

But it leads to code duplication between the several DXVK packages. If several packages share some files, I don't see how making a separate package of them to remove duplication is any "pollution". There's plenty of "-common" packages in the official repos and in the AUR that are exactly that.

1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 16 Next › Last »