Package Details: fastfetch-git 2.10.2.r14.g74c89cc0-2

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/fastfetch-git.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: fastfetch-git
Description: Like neofetch, but much faster because written in c
Upstream URL: https://github.com/fastfetch-cli/fastfetch
Keywords: fastfetch
Licenses: MIT
Conflicts: fastfetch
Provides: fastfetch
Submitter: LinusDierheimer
Maintainer: FabioLolix
Last Packager: FabioLolix
Votes: 16
Popularity: 0.82
First Submitted: 2021-02-18 22:16 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-04-27 09:25 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last »

jakubkaczor commented on 2022-04-06 19:23 (UTC)

@LinusDierheimer I've already noticed. 😊 Thank you. 😉

LinusDierheimer commented on 2022-04-06 12:29 (UTC)

@jakubkaczor flashfetch is now being built again.

fabian-ang commented on 2022-04-05 14:51 (UTC)

Sorry, totally my bad. Some proprietary garbage overwrote my PATH so the ultra outdated cmake bundled in this software was used instead of the system one.

LinusDierheimer commented on 2022-04-05 14:37 (UTC) (edited on 2022-04-05 14:38 (UTC) by LinusDierheimer)

@fabian-ang That is really weird. I don't have libidn11 installed, and it does build perfectly fine for me. Can you narrow it down a bit? I also don't see any reasons why it could be needed. Did you try building in a clean chroot?

fabian-ang commented on 2022-04-05 14:20 (UTC)

Doesn't build for me. I get:

cmake: error while loading shared libraries: libidn.so.11: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

LinusDierheimer commented on 2022-04-04 14:04 (UTC)

@jakubkaczor I will add it again as soon as i push the new update. I am currently modifying the CMakeLists.txt, so i sadly can't push it right now.

jakubkaczor commented on 2022-04-03 08:18 (UTC) (edited on 2022-04-03 20:24 (UTC) by jakubkaczor)

@LinusDierheimer, could you revert “Only build fastfetch” (732242c900fe)? I understand that flashfetch is meant to be configured at compilation time, but I believe the default settings can be sufficient for many people. This change has made updating the package with AUR helper a lot more cumbersome. If it's not possible, perhaps splitting the package into two is an option? Thank you in advance. 😉

LinusDierheimer commented on 2022-03-23 15:58 (UTC)

@dr460nf1r3 thank you, updated.

dr460nf1r3 commented on 2022-03-23 15:55 (UTC)

Now that we have actual pkgvers, the pkgver function could be updated to reflect that like this :)

yochananmarqos commented on 2022-03-08 16:36 (UTC)

@LinusDierheimer: Ah, you're right. I had an older copy of the PKGBUILD. Sorry about the noise.

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last »