Search Criteria
Package Details: fastlane 2.225.0-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/fastlane.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | fastlane |
Description: | The easiest way to automate beta deployments and releases for your iOS and Android apps |
Upstream URL: | https://fastlane.tools |
Keywords: | android ci ios xcode |
Licenses: | MIT |
Submitter: | farwayer |
Maintainer: | farwayer (navarroaxel) |
Last Packager: | navarroaxel |
Votes: | 0 |
Popularity: | 0.000000 |
First Submitted: | 2017-01-10 03:23 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-10-21 02:07 (UTC) |
Latest Comments
1 2 Next › Last »
navarroaxel commented on 2021-05-14 16:50 (UTC) (edited on 2021-05-14 17:18 (UTC) by navarroaxel)
@farwayer as maintainer you should keep the code version up to date with the latest stable release, I saw the same situation with specific releases with bug fixes for the Windows platform and the Arch Linux community repo update the package for this distro too. Anyway, if you want to do that you should communicate that decision to the community too.
Also the Fastlane bug report template https://github.com/fastlane/fastlane/blob/master/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/BUG_REPORT.md says:
And, in https://github.com/fastlane/fastlane/blob/master/fastlane_core/lib/fastlane_core/update_checker/update_checker.rb notifies:
So, I think is important to use the latest version as a user, and when you report bugs to the project.
farwayer commented on 2021-05-14 15:59 (UTC)
2.181 and 2.182 contain non-important improvements and mostly related to XCode and iOS development what does not affect this package for linux. So I decided to skip this versions and wait next version with fully Ruby 3.0 support. If for some reason you always want to have the latest version you can create you own AUR package. This package will be updated rationally and after testing.
navarroaxel commented on 2021-05-14 15:38 (UTC) (edited on 2021-05-14 15:38 (UTC) by navarroaxel)
@farwayer but the 2.181 was published a month ago, and you didn't apply the patch. Also you didn't say that you're working on some update issues and that's why you didn't publish 2.181, and 2.182. If you explain what issues you have with the 2.181 update maybe the community can help you, you should be open about that. We're here for help too.
farwayer commented on 2021-05-14 15:34 (UTC)
@navarroaxel please be patient and stop sending orphan requests. I will publish next version as soon as I will end testing it with ruby 3.0. Ver 2.183.0 with ruby3 support was published half hour ago only.
freesky1102 commented on 2021-03-26 16:38 (UTC)
@ainola
I had given up to use this project and tried to use pure Ruby installation ( rvm -> ruby 2.5.5 -> gem -> fastlane ). It works perfectly.
But if @farwayer could keep updating this project, it still be useful for anyone wants to use it with ease.
ainola commented on 2021-02-25 02:11 (UTC)
Hi, farwayer. I see that you've come out of hibernation and updated this package. Do you intend to continue updating this regularly? If not, consider adopting a co-maintainer. For now I will reject the current vote to orphan this package but please do orphan it yourself if you don't intend to keep up with releases.
freesky1102 commented on 2020-02-10 16:00 (UTC)
@celoclunky
Temporarily, it can be fixed by run "gem install fastlane" after "pacman -S fastlane". Tried and see it run very well. However, I still want to see updates from @farwayer.
celoclunky commented on 2020-02-10 07:53 (UTC) (edited on 2020-02-10 07:55 (UTC) by celoclunky)
@freesky1102
I second this. Got it from a clean (pacman -S fastlane) install. @farwayer, any tips?
freesky1102 commented on 2020-01-17 07:20 (UTC)
@farwayer
I just get this error
Do you know how to solve it ?
freesky1102 commented on 2019-11-19 07:19 (UTC)
@farwayer
if I run this with non-root user "fastlane add_plugin firebase_app_distribution", I got this
but with root user, it was success.
It leads to if I wanna use plugin "firebase_app_distribution", I also need to run "sudo fastlane <lane>".
Is there anyway to do the samething but with non-root user ?
Thanks.
1 2 Next › Last »