Package Details: foo2zjs-nightly 20201127-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/foo2zjs-nightly.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: foo2zjs-nightly
Description: foo2zjs Printer Drivers (automatically updated). Includes also foo2hp, foo2hbpl, foo2oak, foo2xqx, foo2qpdl, foo2slx, foo2hiperc and foo2lava drivers.
Upstream URL: http://foo2zjs.linkevich.net/
Licenses: GPL, custom
Conflicts: foo2zjs
Provides: foo2zjs
Replaces: foo2zjs
Submitter: intelfx
Maintainer: fermino
Last Packager: fermino
Votes: 53
Popularity: 0.35
First Submitted: 2016-11-12 03:35 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-14 18:38 (UTC)

Dependencies (8)

Required by (0)

Sources (37)

Pinned Comments

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 .. 20 Next › Last »

fauno commented on 2018-12-28 14:42 (UTC)

What's supposed to be the bug with ghostscript 9? i just installed foo2zjs for an hp 2600n and the test page looks ok (not great, but not "nasty" either)

cagrajesh commented on 2018-11-09 12:12 (UTC)

thanks @intelfx. you're a life saver for me. But for your (this package), I would have been forced to change distribution that offers solution to my HP1020+ printer (I have 3 Nos in my SOHO). HPLIP toolkit never worked for me and I missed this package greatly. Many thanks to you, sir!

bitsfritz commented on 2018-10-10 20:28 (UTC)

I confirm: foo2zjs is back driving my lj1000 as normal operation.

@intelfix: Thank You :o))

frealgagu commented on 2018-10-08 22:52 (UTC)

I have a CP1020nw I could help with this.

intelfx commented on 2018-10-08 22:03 (UTC)

Also, as I don't own the hardware anymore and lack spare time to work on this package, I'm looking for (co-)maintainers.

intelfx commented on 2018-10-08 21:45 (UTC)

Sorry for my inaction — I somewhy had the notifications turned off for this package. Package bumped. I'm working on the firmware loading problem now.

tmezzadra commented on 2018-10-04 00:21 (UTC)

Hi,

i managed to get it to build modifying patch 0004 https://pastebin.com/NBEqgFs1

This has not been tested yet. i tried to follow the reason behind the original patch. maybe someone can check it. Of course you need to change its integrity checksum in the PKGBUILD.

ron2138 commented on 2018-10-03 09:36 (UTC) (edited on 2018-10-04 23:33 (UTC) by ron2138)

applebloom, JohnML (2018-09-30 18:40, 2018-09-23 09:39)

  1. applebloom, who commented on 2018-09-30 18:40: Were you able to get over that?

  2. JohnML, who commented on 2018-09-23 09:39: Can you upload the output of makepkg you attached, the Package broken stuff, to any, for example ptpb, pastebin like site? I hope it will be clearer there. Do note that asking that doesn't necessarily mean I would be able to help.