Package Details: gprbuild 1:25.0w-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/gprbuild.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: gprbuild
Description: Builder for multi-language systems.
Upstream URL: https://github.com/AdaCore/gprbuild/
Licenses: custom, GPL3
Conflicts: gprbuild-bootstrap, gprbuild-bootstrap-debug
Submitter: None
Maintainer: charlie5
Last Packager: charlie5
Votes: 36
Popularity: 0.010101
First Submitted: 2010-02-03 13:25 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-02-05 03:16 (UTC)

Dependencies (3)

Sources (4)

Pinned Comments

charlie5 commented on 2023-09-16 01:56 (UTC)

hi @wvxvw

Apologies for these problems.

Can you please try the following ...

$ pamac build gprbuild-bootstrap
$ pamac build xmlada
$ pamac build gprbuild gprbuild-toolbox

I've also redirected the doc build output to a log file.

Also, the Ada packages are now available in an unofficial Arch repository.

https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Unofficial_user_repositories

Thanks for reporting.

Regards.

charlie5 commented on 2023-07-09 16:43 (UTC) (edited on 2023-09-16 01:56 (UTC) by charlie5)

This package is available in the Arch Ada Repository.

https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Unofficial_user_repositories

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next › Last »

charlie5 commented on 2022-01-23 14:57 (UTC) (edited on 2022-01-24 07:08 (UTC) by charlie5)

@Armag67

Perhaps try cloning into a new folder and doing 'makepkg' from there. You may have old build artifacts if you have just 'git pull'ed into an existing gprbuild git repo folder. Or just delete the 'src' folder there.

If you are using pacaur, then delete the gprbuild folder in ~/.cache/pacaur and try again.

xiretza commented on 2022-01-23 11:59 (UTC)

That depends on what you did in the first place, but downgrading libgpr to match gprbuild might lead you in the right direction.

Armag67 commented on 2022-01-23 11:56 (UTC) (edited on 2022-01-23 11:56 (UTC) by Armag67)

Hello

@charlie5, my version of GCC is 11.1.0-3

@xiretza, what can y do now?

xiretza commented on 2022-01-23 09:03 (UTC)

@Armag67: it looks like you upgraded libgpr without upgrading gprbuild, so now gprbuild (linked against the old version of the library) can't find a symbol that no longer exists in the new version.

charlie5 commented on 2022-01-23 07:20 (UTC) (edited on 2022-01-23 07:28 (UTC) by charlie5)

hi @Armag67,

I cannot reproduce that error. I will try again soon.

Is your system fully up to date ? Which GCC version are you using ?

Possibly @xiretza can shed some light.

Armag67 commented on 2022-01-22 21:49 (UTC) (edited on 2022-01-22 21:54 (UTC) by Armag67)

Hello,

This evening, libgpr built fine, but with gprbuild, by using the git clone way, I had this traceback:

==> Starting build()...
gprbuild -p -m   -j0 -XBUILD=production -R -cargs -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe -fno-plt -fexceptions         -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2           -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -largs -Wl,-O1,--sort-common,--as-needed,-z,relro,-z,now -gargs gpr/gpr.gpr -XLIBRARY_TYPE=static \
    -XXMLADA_BUILD=static
gprbuild: symbol lookup error: gprbuild: undefined symbol: gpr__empty_file
make: *** [Makefile:146: libgpr.build.static] Error 127
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build().
    Aborting...

And now gnatstudio fails with the traceback:

gnatstudio: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libgnatcoll.so.2021: undefined symbol: gpr__empty_string

charlie5 commented on 2022-01-22 16:23 (UTC) (edited on 2022-01-22 16:24 (UTC) by charlie5)

Thanks @tfl5034 New version is now in the AUR.

tfl5034 commented on 2022-01-22 00:56 (UTC)

I was able to update this package by making the following changes to the PKGBUILD. I removed the ld partial linker patch because it didn't apply cleanly. Looking at the history of linker.xml, they made changes to support partial linking by passing a no-pie flag.

diff --git a/PKGBUILD b/PKGBUILD
index 9f5060e..2780bc5 100644
--- a/PKGBUILD
+++ b/PKGBUILD
@@ -6,8 +6,8 @@
 pkgbase=gprbuild
 pkgname=(libgpr gprbuild)
 epoch=1
-pkgver=21.0.0
-pkgrel=5
+pkgver=22.0.0
+pkgrel=1
 pkgdesc="Builder for multi-language systems"
 arch=('i686' 'x86_64')
 url="https://github.com/AdaCore/gprbuild/"
@@ -19,20 +19,17 @@ source=(
    "gprconfig_kb-$pkgver.tar.gz::https://github.com/AdaCore/gprconfig_kb/archive/v$pkgver.tar.gz"
     'relocatable-build.patch'
     'always-use-host-gprinstall.patch'
-    '0001-Use-ld-as-Library_Partial_Linker.patch'
     '0002-compilers.xml-use-gcc-version-to-get-version-number-.patch'
 )
-sha256sums=('54b7d1a3298160109aaee4d8c263c1ab3ab4abae75d354f3e90a4c51639167a2'
-            '2aec26afad5bb1a4685d9c041c9c797ff5beda211a5e81f2a97452d2ceabc557'
+sha256sums=('076e2b6ac0c7170753a6499094a6d30a98698aca2551c6796b3a617dd9ffc704'
+            'cc19437e0982d9af31e09ad7c42eac6a445dac65336bd53d67ba61f630be7f13'
             'd6479e03e6b6cfb09c133d94e3c47ea5d5e5e756b95554ab3106a679c3d57de4'
             '3fe0fd1df3156c9a8488d98ee6e7e822ae904ce410838661c8fc14c29abe2620'
-            'b1a38e166f54d7b8e85f7351341109200c5712f7bfa79a9233adf8a24e036a3a'
             '9aa8cd9e522fb8a39b2512698885016db1b7286d8fe87d35bdc92e1bc10b20b7')

 prepare() {
     cd "$srcdir/gprconfig_kb-$pkgver"

-    patch -Np1 -i "$srcdir/0001-Use-ld-as-Library_Partial_Linker.patch"
     patch -Np1 -i "$srcdir/0002-compilers.xml-use-gcc-version-to-get-version-number-.patch"

     cd "$srcdir/$pkgbase-$pkgver"

gbabin commented on 2021-05-17 14:32 (UTC)

No, not that I am aware of, but a little sed or patch would make the situation much less confusing.

xiretza commented on 2021-05-16 23:13 (UTC)

@gbabin: does this cause any problems?

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next › Last »