Package Details: gxml 0.20.4-3

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/gxml.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: gxml
Description: GObject-based XML parser and writer library
Upstream URL: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gxml
Licenses: LGPL-2.1-or-later
Provides: libgxml-0.20.so
Submitter: vorot93
Maintainer: yochananmarqos (FabioLolix)
Last Packager: yochananmarqos
Votes: 5
Popularity: 0.000003
First Submitted: 2016-06-21 02:29 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-04-09 17:04 (UTC)

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

StuckUpCreations commented on 2025-04-10 04:09 (UTC)

Thanks that worked

yochananmarqos commented on 2025-04-09 17:07 (UTC)

@StuckUpCreations: The serialization test is failing for some reason. I've relaxed the tests so it will not stop on test failure for now.

StuckUpCreations commented on 2025-04-09 06:30 (UTC)

tried to install planify and got error on gxml:

not ok /gxml/serialization/collection-parent/list/read - ERROR:test/serialization.p/SerializationTest.c:13874:__lambda28_: assertion failed: (found_cpu)
   │ Bail out!
   │ ----------------------------------- stderr -----------------------------------
   │ **
   │ ERROR:test/serialization.p/SerializationTest.c:13874:__lambda28_: assertion failed: (found_cpu)

yochananmarqos commented on 2024-08-29 20:12 (UTC) (edited on 2024-08-29 20:15 (UTC) by yochananmarqos)

@xiota: Thanks, I've added the MR as a patch and updated to 0.20.4. I've confirmed planify works as well.

It was only a couple missing spaces in the syntax? I can't believe I missed that!

yochananmarqos commented on 2024-07-30 22:54 (UTC)

@FabioLolix: I've added you as a Co-Maintainer, thanks.

FabioLolix commented on 2024-07-30 22:52 (UTC)

I would like to maintain gxml, planify no instead

yochananmarqos commented on 2024-07-30 22:49 (UTC)

@FabioLolix: If you would like to maintain planify and gxml, let me know. I only maintain them because it gives me something to do.

I only mentioned AppStream as an example. ;)

FabioLolix commented on 2024-07-30 22:40 (UTC)

With 0.20.3 it wasn't passing and could be fixed and with new version you'll not notice since will always pass, there isn't AppStream stuff here

About AppStream failure in one of my pkgbuilds I'm always passing too since for the developer isn't very relevant

yochananmarqos commented on 2024-07-30 22:33 (UTC)

@FabioLolix: The tests are passing, so it's a moot point with this package.

Either way, the reason I do it is because most of the time it's an AppStream failure that can be ignored.

1 2 Next › Last »