Search Criteria
Package Details: ht-editor 2.1.0-8
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/ht-editor.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | ht-editor |
Description: | executable file editor viewer analyzer for MZ, PE and LE. |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/sebastianbiallas/ht |
Keywords: | ht ht-editor hte |
Licenses: | GPL |
Submitter: | orhun |
Maintainer: | orhun (severach, 4shadoww) |
Last Packager: | orhun |
Votes: | 7 |
Popularity: | 0.000000 |
First Submitted: | 2021-02-08 23:04 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2021-02-08 23:04 (UTC) |
Dependencies (4)
- gcc-libs (gcc-libs-gitAUR, gccrs-libs-gitAUR, gcc11-libsAUR, gcc-libs-snapshotAUR)
- lzo
- ncurses (ncurses-gitAUR)
- texinfo (texinfo-gitAUR) (make)
Latest Comments
4shadoww commented on 2021-02-06 20:20 (UTC)
@Svenstaro I don't know should this be renamed or should this http thing to be named as ht-rust. I am okay with either way. I don't know does the main maintainer have any thoughts on this.
svenstaro commented on 2021-02-06 06:56 (UTC)
I'm not sure what kind of mailing list you mean. I want to talk to the maintainer of this package to see whether they're ok with renaming this and the mailing list wouldn't do much to that end. I suppose we could name the new ht "ht-rust" instead but I think it'd be nicer to have ht-editor and ht.
mxfm commented on 2021-02-06 06:45 (UTC)
@Svenstaro Are you sure that this http client has no alternative name? In this case why not writing request in the relevant mailing list?
svenstaro commented on 2021-02-06 06:06 (UTC)
Any chance this could be renamed to ht-editor again? There's now ht and it does conflict and this one does not have an alternative name it could use.
Excelsior commented on 2020-10-26 09:23 (UTC) (edited on 2020-10-26 09:53 (UTC) by Excelsior)
Build failed with gcc10. Passed after adding this line
after
in build function of PKGBUILD.
severach commented on 2018-03-18 21:06 (UTC)
I took over the package in bulk after all the notifications. All available patches are unreliable. I added a proper patch for abs().
mxfm commented on 2018-02-17 04:12 (UTC)
Can someone takeover the package and make PKGBUILD change specified in the comment below?
wheatdog commented on 2018-02-02 08:19 (UTC)
Add this prepare function to PKGBUILD, then you can build with gcc7.
cengiz_io commented on 2018-01-29 16:38 (UTC)
Hi!
ht fails to build with gcc 7.
Can you please add following patch to PKGBUILD? (if the license is suitable ofc)
https://www.mail-archive.com/opensuse-commit@opensuse.org/msg112232.html