Search Criteria
Package Details: huhnitor-snap 2.0.0-2
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/huhnitor-snap.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | huhnitor-snap |
Description: | An intergalactic serial monitor for the ESP8266 Deauther v3 |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/SpacehuhnTech/Huhnitor |
Licenses: | MIT |
Conflicts: | huhnitor |
Provides: | huhnitor |
Submitter: | vitaliikuzhdin |
Maintainer: | vitaliikuzhdin |
Last Packager: | vitaliikuzhdin |
Votes: | 0 |
Popularity: | 0.000000 |
First Submitted: | 2024-10-09 20:10 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-10-16 10:36 (UTC) |
Dependencies (4)
- gcc-libs (gcc-libs-gitAUR, gccrs-libs-gitAUR, gcc11-libsAUR, gcc-libs-snapshotAUR)
- glibc (glibc-gitAUR, glibc-linux4AUR, glibc-eacAUR, glibc-eac-binAUR, glibc-eac-rocoAUR)
- systemd-libs (systemd-chromiumos-libsAUR, systemd-libs-selinuxAUR, sysupdated-systemd-libs-gitAUR, systemd-libs-fmlAUR, systemd-libs-gitAUR)
- squashfs-tools (squashfs-tools-gitAUR) (make)
Latest Comments
vitaliikuzhdin commented on 2024-10-16 10:43 (UTC) (edited on 2024-10-16 10:44 (UTC) by vitaliikuzhdin)
armhf
has been updated toarmv7h
(following readelf header data).ppc64le
is nowpowerpc64le
(as per the reference from Arch Linux Power).s390x
remains unchanged for potential unofficial builds in the future. The naming should stay consistent if one arises.I'll apply similar changes to my other packages later.
FabioLolix commented on 2024-10-09 21:36 (UTC)
Yet not needed and not usable in real world use case
IMO a good pkgbuild remove things that are not useful
armhf
this isn't valid on ALARMThat list is a kind of patchwork with the arch names taken from all over, not (only) the ones used in Arch e derivates
aarch
this don't existaarch64
this is used, but also listed as arm64, armv8, armv8h, they are the same thingarm
no longer used since years, this was armv5etc..
vitaliikuzhdin commented on 2024-10-09 21:00 (UTC)
@FabioLolix, I couldn't find an official source, but I used this one as a reference: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=288111. Regardless, I don't think it would hurt to have it.
FabioLolix commented on 2024-10-09 20:52 (UTC)
Hello, there isn't Arch Linux for s390x AFAIK