Can't we set different installation paths for the JVM and JDK?
Search Criteria
Package Details: jre 23.0.1-1
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/jdk.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | jdk |
| Description: | Oracle Java Runtime Environment |
| Upstream URL: | https://www.oracle.com/java/ |
| Licenses: | LicenseRef-custom |
| Conflicts: | jdk |
| Provides: | java-runtime, java-runtime-headless, java-runtime-headless-jdk, java-runtime-jdk23, jre23-jdk, jre23-jdk-headless |
| Submitter: | td123 |
| Maintainer: | dbermond |
| Last Packager: | dbermond |
| Votes: | 1087 |
| Popularity: | 0.90 |
| First Submitted: | 2011-08-27 17:56 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2024-11-16 14:08 (UTC) |
Dependencies (12)
- ca-certificates-utils
- freetype2 (freetype2-qdoledAUR, freetype2-macosAUR, freetype2-gitAUR)
- java-runtime-common
- libx11 (libx11-gitAUR)
- libxext (libxext-gitAUR)
- libxi (libxi-gitAUR)
- libxrender
- libxtst
- python-html2text (make)
- alsa-lib (optional) – for basic sound support
- gtk2 (gtk2-maemoAUR, gtk2-patched-filechooser-icon-viewAUR) (optional) – for the Gtk+ 2 look and feel - desktop usage
- gtk3 (gtk3-no_deadkeys_underlineAUR, gtk3-classicAUR, gtk3-classic-xfceAUR, gtk3-patched-filechooser-icon-viewAUR) (optional) – for the Gtk+ 3 look and feel - desktop usage
Required by (1733)
- 2009scape (requires java-runtime)
- 2009scape-git (requires java-runtime)
- 2p-kt (requires java-runtime)
- abchr (requires java-runtime)
- abcl-git (requires java-runtime)
- abdownloadmanager-bin (requires java-runtime)
- acodec-bin (requires java-runtime)
- acronis-cyber-protect-bin (requires java-runtime)
- activemq (requires java-runtime)
- aechoterm-bin (requires java-runtime)
- ahmyth-bin (requires java-runtime)
- aio-remote (requires java-runtime)
- airsonic (requires java-runtime-headless)
- airsonic-advanced-bin (requires java-runtime-headless)
- airsonic-advanced-git (requires java-runtime-headless)
- airsonic-git (requires java-runtime-headless)
- aladin (requires java-runtime)
- alchemist (requires java-runtime)
- alda (requires java-runtime)
- alda-bin (requires java-runtime)
- Show 1713 more...
Sources (9)
vibee commented on 2014-05-30 13:52 (UTC)
Det commented on 2014-05-30 13:39 (UTC)
In simple terms, both packages install same files, so that's why they're in conflict.
vibee commented on 2014-05-30 13:36 (UTC)
Why is this package in conflict with jdk7-openjdk? I would like to install JKD8 and JDK7.
Det commented on 2014-05-15 11:58 (UTC)
It can happen from time to time that Arch pisses me off and I start exclusively using Windows, which doesn't give a crap about Unix permissions.
So there.
liujed commented on 2014-05-15 01:40 (UTC)
Please fix the file permissions on the package's files. Everything in the tarball has mode 777.
Det commented on 2014-04-27 18:58 (UTC)
/opt/java/jre/lib/security/java.policy is now also backed up automatically.
kkl2401 commented on 2014-04-27 18:47 (UTC)
Why?
Det commented on 2014-04-27 13:41 (UTC)
That's what workaround, not a fix. The profile.d scripts are supposed to include non-standard locations in your path.
But to make this work I'd need you to do what I asked you in my last reply.
ansidev commented on 2014-04-27 13:38 (UTC)
@Det: I found the way to fix the error, just run command:
sudo ln -s '/opt/java/bin/java' '/usr/bin/java'
rdjack21 commented on 2014-04-26 04:12 (UTC)
Thanks for this package but I would think that you should install this in /usr/share/doc/java8 instead of /usr/share/doc/java
Pinned Comments
dbermond commented on 2024-03-19 19:54 (UTC)
As was made with the java packages in the official repositories, jdk now provides the jre alongside it, and both packages conflict with each other. During the package upgrade to version 22, act accordingly to your needs. For example, if you have both jdk and jre installed, only jdk will be sufficient, as it now also contains the runtime environment, and jre can be uninstalled. If you have only jre installed, no action is required.