The NetBeans package recently added a dependency on the "classpath" package. Unless I am mistaken, having Oracle's JDK installed fulfills all of the NetBeans package needs. Might I suggest this package be updated to add "classpath" to the "provides" line in PKGBUILD? What I'm getting at is there doesn't seem to be a need to install the "classpath" package if you have this JDK package installed.
Search Criteria
Package Details: jre 24.0.1-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/jdk.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | jdk |
Description: | Oracle Java Runtime Environment |
Upstream URL: | https://www.oracle.com/java/ |
Licenses: | LicenseRef-custom |
Conflicts: | jdk |
Provides: | java-runtime, java-runtime-headless, java-runtime-headless-jdk, java-runtime-jdk24, jre24-jdk, jre24-jdk-headless |
Submitter: | td123 |
Maintainer: | dbermond |
Last Packager: | dbermond |
Votes: | 1088 |
Popularity: | 0.24 |
First Submitted: | 2011-08-27 17:56 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2025-04-16 18:38 (UTC) |
Dependencies (13)
- ca-certificates-utils
- freetype2 (freetype2-macosAUR, freetype2-qdoledAUR, freetype2-gitAUR, freetype2-qdoled-aw3225qfAUR)
- glibc (glibc-gitAUR, glibc-linux4AUR, glibc-eacAUR)
- java-runtime-common
- libx11 (libx11-gitAUR)
- libxext (libxext-gitAUR)
- libxi (libxi-gitAUR)
- libxrender
- libxtst
- python-html2text (make)
- alsa-lib (optional) – for basic sound support
- gtk2 (gtk2-patched-filechooser-icon-viewAUR) (optional) – for the Gtk+ 2 look and feel - desktop usage
- gtk3 (gtk3-no_deadkeys_underlineAUR, gtk3-classic-xfceAUR, gtk3-patched-filechooser-icon-viewAUR, gtk3-classicAUR) (optional) – for the Gtk+ 3 look and feel - desktop usage
Required by (1691)
- 2009scape (requires java-runtime)
- 2009scape-git (requires java-runtime)
- 2p-kt (requires java-runtime)
- abchr (requires java-runtime)
- abcl-git (requires java-runtime)
- abdownloadmanager-bin (requires java-runtime)
- acodec-bin (requires java-runtime)
- acronis-cyber-protect-bin (requires java-runtime)
- activemq (requires java-runtime)
- aechoterm-bin (requires java-runtime)
- ahmyth-bin (requires java-runtime)
- aio-remote (requires java-runtime)
- airsonic (requires java-runtime-headless)
- airsonic-advanced-bin (requires java-runtime-headless)
- airsonic-advanced-git (requires java-runtime-headless)
- aladin (requires java-runtime)
- alchemist (requires java-runtime)
- alda (requires java-runtime)
- alda-bin (requires java-runtime)
- alda-git (requires java-runtime)
- Show 1671 more...
Sources (9)
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 .. 82 Next › Last »
bigcajun commented on 2014-01-31 03:49 (UTC)
Det commented on 2014-01-30 19:41 (UTC)
No, sandy. Firefox doesn't satisfy Chrome, just like JRE doesn't satisfy JDK.
sandy8925 commented on 2014-01-30 18:25 (UTC)
Det: This is the JRE, so shouldn't it satisfy any requirements for java-environment ?
kkl2401 commented on 2014-01-20 12:32 (UTC)
Updated.
kkl2401 commented on 2013-12-28 11:50 (UTC)
Done.
ilpianista commented on 2013-12-28 08:50 (UTC)
Please install a copy of 'Java SE Development Kit 7 Documentation License Agreement' on the system.
Det commented on 2013-12-20 08:30 (UTC)
No, because it _doesn't_ provide it.
dracorp commented on 2013-12-20 08:29 (UTC)
Could you add java-environment to the provides?
Pinned Comments
dbermond commented on 2024-03-19 19:54 (UTC)
As was made with the java packages in the official repositories, jdk now provides the jre alongside it, and both packages conflict with each other. During the package upgrade to version 22, act accordingly to your needs. For example, if you have both jdk and jre installed, only jdk will be sufficient, as it now also contains the runtime environment, and jre can be uninstalled. If you have only jre installed, no action is required.