Yes, yaourt asked me about the conflict and jre should have been removed completely. It is not nice to force removal as 33 packages depend on jre, but OK.
Search Criteria
Package Details: jre 23.0.1-1
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/jdk.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | jdk |
| Description: | Oracle Java Runtime Environment |
| Upstream URL: | https://www.oracle.com/java/ |
| Licenses: | LicenseRef-custom |
| Conflicts: | jdk |
| Provides: | java-runtime, java-runtime-headless, java-runtime-headless-jdk, java-runtime-jdk23, jre23-jdk, jre23-jdk-headless |
| Submitter: | td123 |
| Maintainer: | dbermond |
| Last Packager: | dbermond |
| Votes: | 1087 |
| Popularity: | 0.85 |
| First Submitted: | 2011-08-27 17:56 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2024-11-16 14:08 (UTC) |
Dependencies (12)
- ca-certificates-utils
- freetype2 (freetype2-qdoledAUR, freetype2-macosAUR, freetype2-gitAUR)
- java-runtime-common
- libx11 (libx11-gitAUR)
- libxext (libxext-gitAUR)
- libxi (libxi-gitAUR)
- libxrender
- libxtst
- python-html2text (make)
- alsa-lib (optional) – for basic sound support
- gtk2 (gtk2-maemoAUR, gtk2-patched-filechooser-icon-viewAUR) (optional) – for the Gtk+ 2 look and feel - desktop usage
- gtk3 (gtk3-no_deadkeys_underlineAUR, gtk3-classicAUR, gtk3-classic-xfceAUR, gtk3-patched-filechooser-icon-viewAUR) (optional) – for the Gtk+ 3 look and feel - desktop usage
Required by (1733)
- 2009scape (requires java-runtime)
- 2009scape-git (requires java-runtime)
- 2p-kt (requires java-runtime)
- abchr (requires java-runtime)
- abcl-git (requires java-runtime)
- abdownloadmanager-bin (requires java-runtime)
- acodec-bin (requires java-runtime)
- acronis-cyber-protect-bin (requires java-runtime)
- activemq (requires java-runtime)
- aechoterm-bin (requires java-runtime)
- ahmyth-bin (requires java-runtime)
- aio-remote (requires java-runtime)
- airsonic (requires java-runtime-headless)
- airsonic-advanced-bin (requires java-runtime-headless)
- airsonic-advanced-git (requires java-runtime-headless)
- airsonic-git (requires java-runtime-headless)
- aladin (requires java-runtime)
- alchemist (requires java-runtime)
- alda (requires java-runtime)
- alda-bin (requires java-runtime)
- Show 1713 more...
Sources (9)
silent commented on 2012-10-18 16:19 (UTC)
Det commented on 2012-10-18 16:18 (UTC)
Pfft.. but it doesn't make sense because first off, jre actually _conflicts_ with this one now (so you shouldn't be able to even get that far) and secondly, it's just a _symlink_, which should be removed before upgrading _anyway_ so in what point could it possibly convert itself into a folder?
I just tried installing jre and jdk 7.9-1 back and the -2 upgrade went just fine. I remember running into this problem at some point yesterday, though, but still no idea what's causing it.
nicoulaj commented on 2012-10-18 16:07 (UTC)
jre.
You have to force remove jre before upgrading jdk: sudo pacman -Rdd jre
Det commented on 2012-10-18 15:55 (UTC)
Uhh.. what package are those owned by (pacman -Qo)?
silent commented on 2012-10-18 15:52 (UTC)
error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
jdk: /usr/share/licenses/jdk/COPYRIGHT exists in filesystem
jdk: /usr/share/licenses/jdk/LICENSE exists in filesystem
jdk: /usr/share/licenses/jdk/THIRDPARTYLICENSEREADME-JAVAFX.txt exists in filesystem
jdk: /usr/share/licenses/jdk/THIRDPARTYLICENSEREADME.txt exists in filesystem
Det commented on 2012-10-18 14:14 (UTC)
Who took his vote from this pacakge?!
GIVE IT BACK.
Det commented on 2012-10-18 14:13 (UTC)
And to inform you guys too, I've now included PKGEXT=".pkg.tar" in this package because even on my 6-core system the compression still took almost two minutes. The downside of it is that the size also increased from 69 megabytes to 222, though. So happy HDD shoppings and naggings to make me change it back.
Pinned Comments
dbermond commented on 2024-03-19 19:54 (UTC)
As was made with the java packages in the official repositories, jdk now provides the jre alongside it, and both packages conflict with each other. During the package upgrade to version 22, act accordingly to your needs. For example, if you have both jdk and jre installed, only jdk will be sufficient, as it now also contains the runtime environment, and jre can be uninstalled. If you have only jre installed, no action is required.