Package Details: jtdx 2.2.159-2

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/jtdx.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: jtdx
Description: For amateur radio communication using very weak signals. Forked from WSJT-X.
Upstream URL: https://github.com/jtdx-project/jtdx
Keywords: hamradio jtdx wsjtx
Licenses: GPL3
Conflicts: jtdx-improved, jtdx-improved-jtdxgui
Provides: jtdx
Submitter: joshuarubin
Maintainer: joshuarubin (KF5U)
Last Packager: KF5U
Votes: 7
Popularity: 0.33
First Submitted: 2020-08-13 00:17 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-07-23 07:23 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 Next › Last »

LibreFreq commented on 2021-11-19 06:00 (UTC)

gcc9 is no loner available in the official repos, but in the archive, but jtdx does not compile with it. But somehow or other the PKGBUILD also does not export the compilers. Either you add the compiler edition with

build() {
export CC=/usr/bin/gcc-9
export CXX=/usr/bin/g++-9
export FC=/usr/bin/gfortran-9
...

or you change makedepends to gcc and gcc-fortran, which works fine with 11.1.0.

ew8bak commented on 2021-11-02 19:29 (UTC)

It was at 'gcc9' 'gcc9-fortran'. After installing gcc11 the error disappeared

joshuarubin commented on 2021-11-02 16:21 (UTC)

What compiler/linker are you using?

ew8bak commented on 2021-11-02 12:54 (UTC)

/usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/libQt5Core.so.5.15.2: undefined reference to «std::__exception_ptr::exception_ptr::_M_release()@CXXABI_1.3.13» /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/libQt5Widgets.so.5.15.2: undefined reference to «std::__throw_bad_array_new_length()@GLIBCXX_3.4.29» /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/libQt5Core.so.5.15.2: undefined reference to «std::__exception_ptr::exception_ptr::_M_addref()@CXXABI_1.3.13»

simona commented on 2021-10-01 17:50 (UTC)

with hamlib-git the same result:
/bin/ld: /opt/jtdxhamlib/lib/libhamlib.a(indi_wrapper.o): in function RotINDIClient::newProperty(INDI::Property*)': (.text+0x1de): undefined reference toINDI::Property::getName() const'

joshuarubin commented on 2021-10-01 14:01 (UTC)

added qt5-websockets to depends

joshuarubin commented on 2021-06-01 19:39 (UTC)

Not wrong, but not relevant to how old the code is that it will use to build a package either.

simona commented on 2021-06-01 19:37 (UTC)

hamlib-git: I read last update 2018-02-07 15:47.. is it wrong?

joshuarubin commented on 2021-06-01 19:23 (UTC)

hamlib-git is from 2018 and seems much older than the official hamlib in community package ... why use hamlib-git?

When you use -git packages, they pull in the latest version. I last rebuilt mine from a commit about a month ago.

simona commented on 2021-06-01 11:09 (UTC)

hamlib-git is from 2018 and seems much older than the official hamlib in community package ... why use hamlib-git?

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 Next › Last »