Ah, i see. Just curious: What's the advantage of setting $CHOST manually (I
always thought one wasn't supposed to touch it since it is set automaticly)?
Are there any packages that don't work with the automatic value for you?
Search Criteria
Package Details: libgphobos-git 10.0.0+v2.086.0-2
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/gdc-git.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | gdc-git |
| Description: | Standard library for D programming language, GDC port |
| Upstream URL: | https://gcc.gnu.org/ |
| Licenses: | GPL3 |
| Groups: | dlang |
| Conflicts: | gcc-gdc, libgphobos |
| Provides: | d-runtime, d-stdlib, libgphobos |
| Submitter: | demizer |
| Maintainer: | FFY00 (kozzi) |
| Last Packager: | kozzi |
| Votes: | 16 |
| Popularity: | 0.000000 |
| First Submitted: | 2012-03-23 03:09 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2019-08-23 10:42 (UTC) |
Dependencies (2)
- gdc (gdc-staticAUR, gdc-gitAUR, gcc-d-gitAUR, gcc-d-snapshotAUR, gcc-d) (make)
- git (git-gitAUR, git-glAUR) (make)
Required by (7)
Sources (3)
<deleted-account> commented on 2012-11-04 11:02 (UTC)
cleger commented on 2012-11-04 05:28 (UTC)
>> What exactly did you do?
I had my $CHOST set to x86_64-pc-linux-gnu in makepkg.conf. I changed it back to x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. That worked.
<deleted-account> commented on 2012-11-04 04:06 (UTC)
These files should be removed during packaging via the following lines at the bottom
of the package-function:
rm -rf $pkgdir/usr/bin/{gcc,gcov,cpp,$CHOST-gcc,$CHOST-gcc-$_gccver,c++,g++,$CHOST-c++,$CHOST-g++}
rm -rf $pkgdir/usr/bin/{gcc-ar,gcc-nm,gcc-ranlib,$CHOST-gcc-ar,$CHOST-gcc-nm,$CHOST-gcc-ranlib}
What exactly did you do?
<deleted-account> commented on 2012-11-04 04:02 (UTC)
These files should be removed during packaging via the following lines at the bottom
of the package-function:
rm -rf $pkgdir/usr/bin/{gcc,gcov,cpp,$CHOST-gcc,$CHOST-gcc-$_gccver,c++,g++,$CHOST-c++,$CHOST-g++}
rm -rf $pkgdir/usr/bin/{gcc-ar,gcc-nm,gcc-ranlib,$CHOST-gcc-ar,$CHOST-gcc-nm,$CHOST-gcc-ranlib}
What exactly did you do?
cleger commented on 2012-11-04 03:56 (UTC)
File conflicts with gcc-multilib:
loading packages...
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...
Targets (1): gdc-git-20121104-1
Total Installed Size: 90.08 MiB
Proceed with installation? [Y/n] y
(1/1) checking package integrity [################################################################] 100%
(1/1) loading package files [################################################################] 100%
(1/1) checking for file conflicts [################################################################] 100%
error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
gdc-git: /usr/bin/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-c++ exists in filesystem
gdc-git: /usr/bin/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-g++ exists in filesystem
gdc-git: /usr/bin/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc exists in filesystem
gdc-git: /usr/bin/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc-ar exists in filesystem
gdc-git: /usr/bin/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc-nm exists in filesystem
gdc-git: /usr/bin/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc-ranlib exists in filesystem
Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.
<deleted-account> commented on 2012-10-31 11:51 (UTC)
The source code migrated from bitbucket to github a long time ago, but issues were
still to be reported at bitbucket, there was no wiki on gdcproject.org, etc., so
the project home was still more bitbucket than github (even though the code was at github);
recently they moved these other things over as well, but I did not want to change the url
yet in case they change there minds again. But since it was more or less requested: url changed
to github.
<deleted-account> commented on 2012-10-31 08:09 (UTC)
shouldn't the web address be: https://github.com/D-Programming-GDC/GDC
the project has migrated from bitbucket to github
<deleted-account> commented on 2012-10-29 13:22 (UTC)
The -j3 shouldn't have been there, forgot to remove it after testing (it's gone now).
Pinned Comments