Package Details: libqglviewer 2.9.1-2

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/libqglviewer.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: libqglviewer
Description: C++ library based on Qt that eases the creation of OpenGL 3D viewers
Upstream URL: https://github.com/GillesDebunne/libQGLViewer
Keywords: OpenGL
Licenses: GPL2, custom, GPL3
Conflicts: libqglviewer-qt4
Submitter: ilpianista
Maintainer: sukanka
Last Packager: sukanka
Votes: 14
Popularity: 0.138812
First Submitted: 2009-10-17 21:36 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2023-11-05 14:37 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last »

gian commented on 2014-03-05 20:38 (UTC)

I already informed the upstream author of the problem. Since they are in the examples, I think they can be skipped I uploaded both packages for qt4 and qt5, but without the examples

bo0ts commented on 2014-03-05 13:47 (UTC)

I fixed parts of the PKGBUILD to use 2.5.1, qmake, and depend on qt5-base but get build errors: constrainedFrame.cpp:82:88: no matching call for Viewer::setMouseBinding if I figure out how to fix those, I'll adopt the package and update it.

gian commented on 2014-03-05 13:22 (UTC)

bo0ts, you are right, package orphaned

bo0ts commented on 2014-03-05 09:58 (UTC)

Still no update? Could you yield ownership of this package so someone else can take care of this if you don't have the time to upgrade the package?

aehs29 commented on 2014-02-06 07:06 (UTC)

Newer version 2.5.0 fixes segmentation fault on the examples, it is a problem with qt4 and qt5 I believe. Anyway changing: - pkgver=2.4.0 to pkgver=2.5.0 - the md5 and in the build() function: - qmake-qt4 to qmake will make the package to compile successfully.

gian commented on 2014-01-07 09:11 (UTC)

I know, I will update the package in the next 2 or 3 days. Sorry for the delay

nakednous commented on 2014-01-06 20:27 (UTC)

2.5 has been out for a while

zorun commented on 2013-10-13 22:57 (UTC)

Using this package, all examples from the official libqglviewer website segfault. This may be caused by a qt4/qt5 confusion somewhere, I'll try to investigate further.

gian commented on 2013-06-18 18:02 (UTC)

hi Anthon, it should work now

gian commented on 2013-06-17 13:51 (UTC)

Hi Anthon I contacted the upstream maintainer after I uploaded tha package and it seems that I need to do some more work to have a package that work. Sorry for now, I will update the package as soon as possible. (possibly today/tomorrow)