Package Details: linux-amd-znver2-headers 6.11.0-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-amd-znver2.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-amd-znver2
Description: Headers and scripts for building modules for the linux-amd-znver2 package
Upstream URL: https://www.kernel.org/
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Submitter: None
Maintainer: archdevlab
Last Packager: archdevlab
Votes: 17
Popularity: 0.42
First Submitted: 2020-10-26 18:04 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-10-11 02:39 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next › Last »

s3rj1k commented on 2021-09-17 12:36 (UTC)

Yea, seems ok, yay AUR build cache was in the way, thanks

<deleted-account> commented on 2021-09-17 09:14 (UTC)

Yeah, thought so; it should have been fixed with the last commit yesterday? Otherwise I'm not following.

s3rj1k commented on 2021-09-17 08:39 (UTC)

@eggz latest change broke build at sha256sums check for renamed patch, sorry about stating that for the other kernel, got a bit mixed-up.

GJRodenburg commented on 2021-08-25 06:20 (UTC)

@eggz, just a quick note to say thanks for maintaining this 'flavour' of the kernel.

<deleted-account> commented on 2021-08-18 21:34 (UTC)

I added fscrypt support due to popular demand (I have had this question before), but I have my reservations over its security and performance. Luks seems to be a much better way to do this...

s3rj1k commented on 2021-08-18 12:43 (UTC)

please enable CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION build option

<deleted-account> commented on 2021-06-28 08:27 (UTC)

Linux Kernel 5.13 git development log:

      amdgpu:
       - Revert GFX9/10 doorbell fixes, we just end up trading one bug for
         another

Yeah, totaly didn't see that one coming ..

5.13 Coming up.

<deleted-account> commented on 2021-06-26 13:18 (UTC)

OK I reverted the "doorbell" (thats how they call it in the git...) commits to remove the idle bug. The AMDGPU team should really consider testing their commits before mainlining them ...

<deleted-account> commented on 2021-06-26 12:52 (UTC)

@GJRodenburg, as explained and proven by linux-slim, I have the fix. The question was if I should implement it. I guess thats a yes.

@DanEng Performance stays the same on all my systems, I got no idea about that.

DanEng1982 commented on 2021-06-26 10:31 (UTC) (edited on 2021-06-26 10:34 (UTC) by DanEng1982)

My experience is this since the latest kernel - same applies to 5.13-RC7-mainline tho: Geekbench gave me a multi-core score of some 7200-7600 in the past, since the last releases of the mentioned kernel versions I only get some 4100-4200 points on the same machine (Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ARE05 with Ryzen 7 4800U and 16GB RAM), nothing else has changed. I am not saying that your kernel is at fault and to be fair and honest it doesn't feel slower at all, might even be just a glitch with Geekbench. But this is just my two cents.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next › Last »