Package Details: linux-ck-headers 6.11.10-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-ck.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-ck
Description: Headers and scripts for building modules for Linux-ck kernel
Upstream URL: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Submitter: graysky
Maintainer: graysky
Last Packager: graysky
Votes: 458
Popularity: 0.094674
First Submitted: 2011-07-22 14:51 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-26 13:15 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 .. 308 Next › Last »

cryzed commented on 2016-07-28 01:03 (UTC) (edited on 2016-07-28 01:44 (UTC) by cryzed)

@grasky, yes: pacaur. Should I run makepkg manually? I want to note that I have been using pacaur previously to install and update linux-ck without any problems. EDIT: Running it manually right now using "makepkg -fsic". EDIT 2: Well that worked. That's the first time an AUR helper bit me, especially pacaur which is supposed to be very reliable (https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_helpers#Comparison_table). Sorry about this.

graysky commented on 2016-07-28 00:56 (UTC)

Are you using an aur helper?

cryzed commented on 2016-07-28 00:36 (UTC) (edited on 2016-07-28 00:41 (UTC) by cryzed)

When updating to the latest version, I get the following error after the seemingly successful compilation process: > ==> Finished making: linux-ck 4.6.5-2 (Do 28. Jul 02:33:40 CEST 2016) > ==> Cleaning up... > :: Installing linux-ck,linux-ck-headers package(s)... > :: linux-ck,linux-ck-headers package(s) failed to install. Check .SRCINFO for mismatching data with PKGBUILD. The .SRCINFO looks like this: https://gist.github.com/anonymous/596f391daa1fca584798684e5b99cd70. I did the following modifications to the PKGBUILD: > _1k_HZ_ticks= > _BFQ_enable_=y I don't use the sleep/suspend feature, hence the first change. My /etc/makepkg.conf has the following modifications: > CFLAGS="-march=native -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong" > CXXFLAGS="-march=native -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong" > MAKEFLAGS="-j$(nproc)"

graysky commented on 2016-07-27 21:16 (UTC)

@blitz - Yes, I assumed the filename will change, and I'll have to update it :p If you catch it before someone else posts here, please email me privately so I can push the change and minimize impact of users building from the AUR. Thanks.

blitz commented on 2016-07-27 21:04 (UTC)

@graysky 2016-07-27 21:01 That was fast, while /me wrote mail message to Paolo Valente with regard to broken filenaming sequence, -blkck- vs -block-

graysky commented on 2016-07-27 21:01 (UTC) (edited on 2016-07-27 21:01 (UTC) by graysky)

Bump to v4.6.5-2 Changelog: 4.6.5-1 neglected to apply one of the BFQ patches; 4.6.5-2 fixes it (thanks to Lucjan Lucjanov for pointing this out). Commit: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck/Changelog

graysky commented on 2016-07-27 18:21 (UTC)

Bump to v4.6.5-1 Changelog: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/ChangeLog-4.6.5 Commit: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck/Changelog

graysky commented on 2016-07-11 21:57 (UTC)

Bump to v4.6.4-1 Changelog: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/ChangeLog-4.6.4 Commit: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck/Changelog

graysky commented on 2016-06-25 15:33 (UTC)

Bump to v4.6.3-1 Changelog: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/ChangeLog-4.6.3 Commit: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck/Changelog LinuxChanges: http://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_4.6 Paolo has assured me that BFQ v7 is fine for the 4.6.x series of kernels; the bug that is affecting it applies equally to 4.5.x kernel users so there is no harm in including it against the 4.6.x series. He is testing prev8 of BFQ now but would not predict a release date. Enjoy the 4.6 series.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 .. 308 Next › Last »