Package Details: linux-ck-headers 6.11.10-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-ck.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-ck
Description: Headers and scripts for building modules for Linux-ck kernel
Upstream URL: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Submitter: graysky
Maintainer: graysky
Last Packager: graysky
Votes: 459
Popularity: 0.137884
First Submitted: 2011-07-22 14:51 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-26 13:15 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 .. 308 Next › Last »

Distorted commented on 2021-01-09 00:32 (UTC)

Why is CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO=y set? It causes builds to use over 10GB in disk space.

bryanjhv commented on 2021-01-08 22:13 (UTC)

@graysky, is there possibility to change _package-headers' depends array using "$pkgbase" instead of fixed 'linux-ck'? I was building for silvermont (changing $pkgbase to linux-ck-silvermont the way some repositories provide it), and didn't notice it until installing linux-ck-silvermont-headers asked me to also install linux-ck instead of linux-ck-silvermont.

bryanjhv commented on 2021-01-08 22:05 (UTC) (edited on 2021-01-08 22:08 (UTC) by bryanjhv)

Ignoring the error would make things unpredictable. Just remove "-N" option so patch will try to reverse-apply and re-apply.

Kr1ss commented on 2021-01-03 11:14 (UTC)

@LucidComplex That would make it pass though also in situations where the patch itself fails for a different reason. Not sure if that's what you want to achieve.

LucidComplex commented on 2021-01-03 10:47 (UTC)

prepare() fails when patches have already been applied. I suppose you can append a || true to the end of patch commands in prepare() to address this.

Kr1ss commented on 2021-01-02 21:24 (UTC) (edited on 2021-01-02 22:06 (UTC) by Kr1ss)

@graysky The checksum for config doesn't match in the recent release.

EDIT/ Thank you fixing this so quickly ! :)

graysky commented on 2021-01-02 20:36 (UTC)

My bad... git push didn't respond for some reason.

Scimmia commented on 2021-01-02 19:32 (UTC)

I haven't found 5.10.4-2, but as long as linux-headers isn't in the provides array anymore, I'm fine with it.

graysky commented on 2021-01-01 14:33 (UTC)

@scimmia - Please review 5.10.4-2 and comment

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 .. 308 Next › Last »