Package Details: linux-ck-headers 6.11.10-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-ck.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-ck
Description: Headers and scripts for building modules for Linux-ck kernel
Upstream URL: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Submitter: graysky
Maintainer: graysky
Last Packager: graysky
Votes: 458
Popularity: 0.090807
First Submitted: 2011-07-22 14:51 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-26 13:15 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 .. 308 Next › Last »

graysky commented on 2013-09-07 00:44 (UTC)

BFQ is ready for 3.11 series. For those of you [misc] who like to see or build/run the pre-release of the next linux-ck as we wait for CK to patch into the new tree, I am hosting the incomplete (no ck1) stuff here: http://repo-ck.com/PKG_source/ck-next/ck-next-1.0.tar.xz Note that all the PKGBUILDs/files for the xxx-ck stuff are in the tar file: % tar tf ck-next-1.0.tar.xz| grep PKGBUILD ./lirc-ck/PKGBUILD ./virtualbox-ck-modules/PKGBUILD ./broadcom-wl-ck/PKGBUILD ./nvidia-ck/PKGBUILD ./nvidia-304xx-ck/PKGBUILD ./linux-ck/PKGBUILD

SanskritFritz commented on 2013-09-05 07:13 (UTC)

@dlh Yes, my mouse doesn't stutter when CPU load is high or copying large files in the background.

dlh commented on 2013-09-05 07:09 (UTC)

Do you guys noticed any difference using ck kernel in context of workflow?

skydrome commented on 2013-09-04 04:14 (UTC)

its also a good idea not to jump on new kernels like this the instant they are released. Waiting for a .1 or .2 is more pleasant. Which is likely when BFS will be adopted to it.

runnytu commented on 2013-09-03 10:05 (UTC)

Ok i understand, thanks for the info, had not given the opportunity to see a change in kernel version in the early days until now, had always been after, when the packages are released.

graysky commented on 2013-09-03 09:52 (UTC)

Example, virtualbox: https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2013-September/034088.html

graysky commented on 2013-09-03 09:50 (UTC)

You can help by keeping an eye out for the ck1 patchset. It usually takes CK 1-2 weeks to get a patchset together for a major version bump. 3.11-1-ARCH has been published, so configs and patches, etc. aren't an issue. The only other must have is a BFQ patchset for the 3.11 tree. Paolo et al usually do a pretty good job timewise. Another wildcard is are the speed at which devs patch needed modules to build with 3.11. Nvidia and virtualbox for example.

runnytu commented on 2013-09-03 09:41 (UTC)

@graysky I flagged the package before read your post, sorry for the inconvenients, i don't know what are the differents procedures when a major release of kernel are taken, sorry for that, i wait until upstream code and all patches for ck and bfs are released.

graysky commented on 2013-09-03 09:00 (UTC)

@runnytu -did you read my last post??? Why are you flagging this package when upstream code doesn't yet exist?

graysky commented on 2013-09-02 21:50 (UTC)

Guys - I realize that 3.11.0 was just mainlined, but we don't yet have several of the prereqs to make a proper linux-ck release[1]: *ck1 *bfq Please flag it again once we have them in case I miss it. 1. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck#Release_Cycle

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 .. 308 Next › Last »