Search Criteria
Package Details: linux-ck-headers 6.11.10-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-ck.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | linux-ck |
Description: | Headers and scripts for building modules for Linux-ck kernel |
Upstream URL: | https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck |
Licenses: | GPL-2.0-only |
Submitter: | graysky |
Maintainer: | graysky |
Last Packager: | graysky |
Votes: | 459 |
Popularity: | 0.135126 |
First Submitted: | 2011-07-22 14:51 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-11-26 13:15 (UTC) |
Dependencies (11)
- linux-ckAUR
- pahole (pahole-gitAUR)
- bc (bc-ghAUR) (make)
- cpio (cpio-gitAUR) (make)
- gettext (gettext-gitAUR) (make)
- libelf (elfutils-gitAUR) (make)
- pahole (pahole-gitAUR) (make)
- perl (perl-gitAUR) (make)
- python (python37AUR, python311AUR, python310AUR) (make)
- tar (tar-gitAUR, busybox-coreutilsAUR) (make)
- xz (xz-gitAUR) (make)
Required by (8)
- ch343-dkms (optional)
- ch343ser-dkms-git (optional)
- ch9344ser-dkms-git (optional)
- e1000e-dkms (optional)
- fl2000-dkms (optional)
- i2c-ch341-dkms (optional)
- igb-dkms (optional)
- spi-config-dkms (optional)
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 .. 308 Next › Last »
graysky commented on 2018-08-10 18:56 (UTC)
@gee - Thanks, any feedback (assuming you're running that patched code)? I passed CK your proposal for review. To your question, just rename the pkgbase from linux-ck to linux-whatever-you-want
sispus commented on 2018-08-10 10:28 (UTC) (edited on 2018-08-10 11:03 (UTC) by sispus)
@ sir_lucjan
thank you, but I think I don't understand what to do. I did:
sudo pacman-key --recv-key 38DBBDC86092693E
it replied:
gpg: bad data signature from key 8396F1D05506E82D: Wrong key usage (0x19, 0x2)
gpg: bad data signature from key 20E8A9C77716EB4F: Wrong key usage (0x19, 0x2)
I did also that without realizing "wrong key usage" warning:
sudo pacman-key --lsign-key 38DBBDC86092693E
Now when I repeat above command (--recv-key) it says: Remote key not fetched correctly from keyserver.
I don't know if these info is helpful. If not, I'm sorry...
edit: I found this from a forum and solved: gpg --recv-keys 38DBBDC86092693E
sir_lucjan commented on 2018-08-10 09:53 (UTC)
@ sispus
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=191954
sispus commented on 2018-08-10 09:49 (UTC)
I couldn't install it to manjaro xfce. linux-4.17.11.tar ... FAILED (unknown public key 38DBBDC86092693E) ==> ERROR: One or more PGP signatures could not be verified!
gee commented on 2018-08-10 08:29 (UTC) (edited on 2018-08-10 09:27 (UTC) by gee)
@graysky, I've patched ck's patch to build with .14, it was fairly easy, hopefully I made no mistake: https://pastebin.com/WDVt52ZB
Unrelated, but how do I easily get this package to be named similarly to the one I'd get from your repo, in my case -haswell?
melcor333 commented on 2018-08-09 23:20 (UTC) (edited on 2018-08-09 23:28 (UTC) by melcor333)
@graysky - I'll try thanks
EDIT: Perfect! Working as intended. Thanks a lot! :)
melcor333 commented on 2018-08-09 23:18 (UTC)
Hi, since last 2 updates I'm unable to boot to GUI, because of nvidia isn't found in kernel modules. I get this error during install:
==> ERROR: module not found:
nvidia' ==> ERROR: module not found:
nvidia_modeset' ==> ERROR: module not found:nvidia_uvm' ==> ERROR: module not found:
nvidia_drm'I have nvidia-ck and linux-ck-headers installed. Is there anything I'm doing wrong?
GPU is Nvidia GTX960. Before this everything worked flawlessly.
Thanks
graysky commented on 2018-08-09 21:16 (UTC)
@melcor333 - broadcom and nvidia-* have been updated. Please try and reported back. broadcom and nvidia-340xx work for me on my test box.
graysky commented on 2018-08-09 21:06 (UTC)
Yes, the naming schema has changed. I will push some updates shortly.
« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 .. 308 Next › Last »