Search Criteria
Package Details: linux-ck-headers 6.11.10-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-ck.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | linux-ck |
Description: | Headers and scripts for building modules for Linux-ck kernel |
Upstream URL: | https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck |
Licenses: | GPL-2.0-only |
Submitter: | graysky |
Maintainer: | graysky |
Last Packager: | graysky |
Votes: | 459 |
Popularity: | 0.132423 |
First Submitted: | 2011-07-22 14:51 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-11-26 13:15 (UTC) |
Dependencies (11)
- linux-ckAUR
- pahole (pahole-gitAUR)
- bc (bc-ghAUR) (make)
- cpio (cpio-gitAUR) (make)
- gettext (gettext-gitAUR) (make)
- libelf (elfutils-gitAUR) (make)
- pahole (pahole-gitAUR) (make)
- perl (perl-gitAUR) (make)
- python (python37AUR, python311AUR, python310AUR) (make)
- tar (tar-gitAUR, busybox-coreutilsAUR) (make)
- xz (xz-gitAUR) (make)
Required by (8)
- ch343-dkms (optional)
- ch343ser-dkms-git (optional)
- ch9344ser-dkms-git (optional)
- e1000e-dkms (optional)
- fl2000-dkms (optional)
- i2c-ch341-dkms (optional)
- igb-dkms (optional)
- spi-config-dkms (optional)
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 .. 308 Next › Last »
SilverMight commented on 2018-03-23 10:37 (UTC)
Getting error: linux-ck-skylake: missing required signature when trying to update from repo-ck.com... I have the pacman key added and I tried it again, however it still fails to update
sir_lucjan commented on 2018-03-22 10:30 (UTC)
@shanti
See:
https://github.com/sirlucjan/lucjan-kernels/blob/master/lucjan-kernels-experimental/v4.15/linux-bfq-sq-mq-haswell/PKGBUILD#L137
Works fine.
shanti commented on 2018-03-22 09:12 (UTC)
@sir_lucjan
thanks I added the lines you provided however I am still unable to apply the bfq-sq-mq patch successfully,
Makefile.rej gives:
[code]--- Makefile +++ Makefile @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ VERSION = 4 PATCHLEVEL = 15 SUBLEVEL = 11 -EXTRAVERSION = +EXTRAVERSION = NAME = Fearless Coyote
DOCUMENTATION --- Makefile +++ Makefile @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ VERSION = 4 PATCHLEVEL = 15 SUBLEVEL = 11 -EXTRAVERSION = +EXTRAVERSION =-mq NAME = Fearless Coyote
DOCUMENTATION[/code]
shanti commented on 2018-03-22 09:07 (UTC)
@sir_lucjan
thanks I added the lines you provided however I am still unable to apply the bfq-sq-mq patch successfully,
Makefile.rej gives:
[--- Makefile +++ Makefile @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ VERSION = 4 PATCHLEVEL = 15 SUBLEVEL = 11 -EXTRAVERSION = +EXTRAVERSION = NAME = Fearless Coyote
# DOCUMENTATION --- Makefile +++ Makefile @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ VERSION = 4 PATCHLEVEL = 15 SUBLEVEL = 11 -EXTRAVERSION = +EXTRAVERSION =-mq NAME = Fearless Coyote
# DOCUMENTATION]
vp1981 commented on 2018-03-22 01:16 (UTC) (edited on 2018-03-22 01:17 (UTC) by vp1981)
@Terence:
you mean the kernel cmdline option?
I have felling that that's wrong (may be because now BFQ in mainline). Some time ago I tried to follow closely BFQ development and had impression that new 'BFQ-MQ' is now 'BFQ' in mainline. This line
mq-deadline kyber [bfq] none
tells me that bfq in my case is BFQ-MQ (because all these schedulers are MQ).
sir_lucjan commented on 2018-03-21 17:23 (UTC)
@Terence
Nope, I have my own kernel with bfq patchset.
Terence commented on 2018-03-21 17:20 (UTC)
@sir_lucjan yes, you have bfq-mq and bfq I was just saying vp1981 only had bfq. I see you have bfq-mq. Is this from latest linux-ck? Did you have to do somethign to enable it?
sir_lucjan commented on 2018-03-21 16:05 (UTC)
@Terence:
bfq != bfq-mq
Terence commented on 2018-03-21 16:00 (UTC)
@vp1981, I think so because you do not have the option to enable bfq-mq anymore and it should appear as bfq-mq in the list of schedulers.
vp1981 commented on 2018-03-21 14:23 (UTC) (edited on 2018-03-21 14:24 (UTC) by vp1981)
$ uname -a
Linux smoon.vl-lomov.ru 4.15.11-1-ck-haswell #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue Mar 20 11:27:59 EDT 2018 x86_64 GNU/Linux
$ cat /proc/cmdline
BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-linux-ck-haswell root=UUID=162d2744-158f-46b5-b3e8-fdc25739c96a rw systemd.unified_cgroup_hierarchy=1 scsi_mod.use_blk_mq=1 quiet
$ cat /sys/block/sd*/queue/scheduler
mq-deadline kyber [bfq] none mq-deadline kyber [bfq] none mq-deadline kyber [bfq] none mq-deadline kyber [bfq] none mq-deadline kyber [bfq] none
@Terence, is that mean that I don't have BFQ-MQ?
« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 .. 308 Next › Last »