Package Details: linux-ck-headers 6.11.10-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-ck.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-ck
Description: Headers and scripts for building modules for Linux-ck kernel
Upstream URL: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Submitter: graysky
Maintainer: graysky
Last Packager: graysky
Votes: 459
Popularity: 0.129775
First Submitted: 2011-07-22 14:51 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-26 13:15 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 .. 308 Next › Last »

AstroProfundis commented on 2018-01-25 05:53 (UTC)

I tried to disable CONFIG_SCHED_MUQSS in defconfig (and regenerated the config file thus enabled FAIR_GROUP_SCHED and CFS_BANDWIDTH automatically), the build was success without error. Hope this info helps.

vp1981 commented on 2018-01-25 01:09 (UTC)

Hello, just for the record: https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-block/msg21999.html and corresponding commit is in 4.14.15.

I'm not familiar with MuQSS source but hope that the fix is simple enough and CK make new ck2.

sir_lucjan commented on 2018-01-24 19:55 (UTC)

I tried to compile linux-ck but I had the same error.

sir_lucjan commented on 2018-01-24 19:51 (UTC)

Look, I think there's been a misunderstanding.

Error seems related to ck-patchset/muqss. I don't use muqss / ck patchset.

Sources 4.14.15 build fine without errors.

sir_lucjan commented on 2018-01-24 19:50 (UTC)

Look, I think there's been a misunderstanding.

Error seems related to ck-patchset/muqss. I don't use muqss / ck patchset.

Sources 4.14.15 build fine without errors.

graysky commented on 2018-01-24 19:44 (UTC)

Yes but without MuQSS. Works fine. Seems related to ck-patchset.

...without MuQSS? So if you apply all the patches in the broken out ck1 except for 0001-MuQSS-version-0.162-CPU-scheduler.patch you are able to build without error?

sir_lucjan commented on 2018-01-24 15:48 (UTC)

@graysky

Yes but without MuQSS. Works fine.

Seems related to ck-patchset.

graysky commented on 2018-01-24 15:35 (UTC)

@sir_l - you compiled 4.14.15-1 without errors? Looks like you're building a differently named kernel. What are the differences vs linux-ck?

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 .. 308 Next › Last »