Package Details: linux-ck-headers 6.11.10-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-ck.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-ck
Description: Headers and scripts for building modules for Linux-ck kernel
Upstream URL: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Submitter: graysky
Maintainer: graysky
Last Packager: graysky
Votes: 458
Popularity: 0.106874
First Submitted: 2011-07-22 14:51 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-26 13:15 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 .. 308 Next › Last »

enihcam commented on 2017-01-14 13:17 (UTC)

@graysky The issue is discussed here: http://ck-hack.blogspot.com/2016/12/linux-49-ck1-muqss-version-0150.html?showComment=1481533077370#c7648396274643602658 Seems like one patch is missing.

graysky commented on 2017-01-14 12:42 (UTC)

Stop using an AUR helper which I believe you're using and just build with makepkg.

enihcam commented on 2017-01-14 06:41 (UTC) (edited on 2017-01-14 12:05 (UTC) by enihcam)

Both of my two machines failed in compiling Linux-ck 4.9.3 with GCC 6.3.1. Anyone got the same issue? <-Log Start--------------> LD fs/built-in.o ==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build(). Aborting... ==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build linux-ck. ==> Restart building linux-ck ? [y/N] ==> --------------------------------- ==> <-Log End------------->

SanskritFritz commented on 2017-01-13 21:55 (UTC)

Users of nvidia-304xx have held back the last version anyway since current version doesn't work at all :D

graysky commented on 2017-01-13 21:47 (UTC)

Bump to v4.9.3-1 Changelog: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/ChangeLog-4.9.3 Commit: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck/Changelog Linux changes: https://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_4.9 Notes: Users of nvidia-304xx will have to pull the corresponding utils package from [testing] until 4.9 is pushed into [core]. Sorry about the inconvenience but way more users of linux-ck want the 4.9 series kernel and I didn't want to hold it up any longer.

graysky commented on 2017-01-12 21:19 (UTC)

@artafinde - READ 2 POSTS DOWN

artafinde commented on 2017-01-12 21:05 (UTC)

Is there a reason the linux 4.9.x is not pushed to repos yet? Someone mentioned in ML that's it's unstable - and seen reports of crashes on BTRFS ML.

graysky commented on 2017-01-12 19:35 (UTC)

For those wanting the 4.9.3 release - http://repo-ck.com/PKG_source/next/linux-ck-493.tar.xz

graysky commented on 2017-01-12 07:24 (UTC)

@enihcam - Not out-of-date, plz read comments. graysky commented on 2017-01-07 19:25 graysky commented on 2016-12-22 19:02

zerophase commented on 2017-01-11 05:22 (UTC)

@graysky sounds like an efi issue.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 .. 308 Next › Last »