Package Details: linux-ck-headers 6.11.10-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-ck.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-ck
Description: Headers and scripts for building modules for Linux-ck kernel
Upstream URL: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Submitter: graysky
Maintainer: graysky
Last Packager: graysky
Votes: 458
Popularity: 0.100589
First Submitted: 2011-07-22 14:51 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-26 13:15 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 .. 308 Next › Last »

snack commented on 2016-11-20 09:42 (UTC)

I fixed by removing all the old linux-ck files from /boot (keeping the linux-ck-core2 ones) and substituting "linux-ck" with "linux-ck-core2" everywhere in /boot/grub/grub.cfg

snack commented on 2016-11-20 09:31 (UTC) (edited on 2016-11-20 09:34 (UTC) by snack)

Update to linux-ck-core2 4.8.9-1/2 from repo broke my system. Boot fails because my grub configuration (which used to work up to 4.8.6) searches for /boot/vmlinuz-linux-ck, while with 4.8.9 I got /boot/vmlinuz-linux-ck-core2. Fixing it in the grub command line the boot fails again complaining that /lib/modules/4.8.9-2-ck-core2/modules.devname is missing, while the file itself is present. The boot media is an ext4 ssd. Should I update something in my system configuration or is the linux-ck-core2 package broken?

QuartzDragon commented on 2016-11-20 04:18 (UTC)

@graysky Now I understand better; I was just confused by the changes and how they worked. Thanks, graysky! :)

graysky commented on 2016-11-19 19:57 (UTC)

Bump to v4.8.9-2 Changelog: Fix checksums and bump for repo rebuild. Commit: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck/Changelog

sidneycrestani commented on 2016-11-19 19:21 (UTC)

@marceliq yes, patch-4.8.9.xz sha256sum fails

marceliq commented on 2016-11-19 14:53 (UTC)

Hi, is it just me or sha256sums of patch-4.8.9.xz doesn't match for you either?

sir_lucjan commented on 2016-11-19 14:13 (UTC)

@graysky - you have absolutely right.

graysky commented on 2016-11-19 12:32 (UTC)

@fafryd - I don't think it's a problem since the PKGBULD renames the hook on the filesystem. See my comment in FS#51818 for more.

graysky commented on 2016-11-19 12:27 (UTC)

@fafryd - Yes, linux-ck is shipping 99-linux.hook since 4.8.8-2. I posted in the bug report you referenced asking if the hook needs a unique name. Right now linux-ck shares the name with linux which might be a problem. We can make the change if needed. Thank you for bring this to my attention.

fafryd commented on 2016-11-19 12:03 (UTC) (edited on 2016-11-19 12:24 (UTC) by fafryd)

>Every linux package (linux, linux-zen, linux-lts, linux-grsec, ... AUR packages >like linux-git, ...) has to ship its own hook. https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/51818 edit: http://pastebin.com/DLTbkhZS

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 .. 308 Next › Last »