Package Details: linux-ck 6.12.1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-ck.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-ck
Description: The Linux kernel and modules with ck's hrtimer patches
Upstream URL: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Provides: KSMBD-MODULE, VIRTUALBOX-GUEST-MODULES, WIREGUARD-MODULE
Replaces: virtualbox-guest-modules-arch, wireguard-arch
Submitter: graysky
Maintainer: graysky
Last Packager: graysky
Votes: 459
Popularity: 0.24
First Submitted: 2011-07-22 14:51 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-23 13:58 (UTC)

Dependencies (14)

Required by (6)

Sources (6)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 .. 308 Next › Last »

mssdvd commented on 2016-07-29 08:28 (UTC)

Kernel panic after update 4.6.5-1 -> 4.6.5-2 (KDE BFQ IvyBridge)

mradermaxlol commented on 2016-07-29 05:35 (UTC)

@graysky if you wanna know, everything's just fine after the latest update - stuff is buildable, at least for me. I can't understand why -ck patch was ruining the build, though; maybe I'm just dumb.

graysky commented on 2016-07-28 18:58 (UTC)

3.6.5-2 has been updated the corrected name of the 4th patch; the checksums remain the same since upstream did not change the content, only the name.

mradermaxlol commented on 2016-07-28 15:27 (UTC) (edited on 2016-07-28 15:48 (UTC) by mradermaxlol)

I'm getting patching errors (likely) during prepare() execution which result in makepkg build failure. It's happening at -ck patchset applying, and I have completely no idea what's causing it - maybe these patches are outdated, maybe it's just 4.6.5-incompatible (although I don't think so as errors happen in bfq.c/bfq.h files, for example). Right now my best guess is that the fourth BFQ patch is causing that, because that makes sense - it might be okay a while ago, but now its name in PKGBUILD is useless as it's wrong; I've changed it as @herraiz suggested and, well, everything's okay except patching X) Does anybody else experience this issue as well? EDIT: After a little research I've found out (I hope so) that the thing responsible for that problem is... Yup, the -ck patchset itself. Ta-daa!

herraiz commented on 2016-07-28 14:23 (UTC) (edited on 2016-07-28 14:23 (UTC) by herraiz)

@nTia89: the third patch has changed, you have probably an old copy of the third patch in your sources dir.

nTia89 commented on 2016-07-28 13:16 (UTC)

other than corrected forth name's patch, in order to have a working pkgbuild, we need to correct the checksum for the third patch

graysky commented on 2016-07-28 09:25 (UTC)

I will update the source array for the renamed patch but this is technically not out of date since the content of that patch did not change. See my post a few down (we knew this change was coming).

herraiz commented on 2016-07-28 08:25 (UTC)

I think there is a typo in one of the URLs. I am getting the following error: curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404 Not Found ==> ERROR: Failure while downloading http://algo.ing.unimo.it/people/paolo/disk_sched/patches/4.6.0-v8/0004-blkck-bfq-turn-BFQ-v7r11-for-4.7.0-into-BFQ-v8-for-4.patch The correct URL is http://algo.ing.unimo.it/people/paolo/disk_sched/patches/4.6.0-v8/0004-block-bfq-turn-BFQ-v7r11-for-4.7.0-into-BFQ-v8-for-4.patch (blkck -> block)

FadeMind commented on 2016-07-28 02:54 (UTC)

Hi @graysky https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/bfq-iosched/wAKntB66OHs BFQ changelog. Regards FadeMind

cryzed commented on 2016-07-28 01:03 (UTC) (edited on 2016-07-28 01:44 (UTC) by cryzed)

@grasky, yes: pacaur. Should I run makepkg manually? I want to note that I have been using pacaur previously to install and update linux-ck without any problems. EDIT: Running it manually right now using "makepkg -fsic". EDIT 2: Well that worked. That's the first time an AUR helper bit me, especially pacaur which is supposed to be very reliable (https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_helpers#Comparison_table). Sorry about this.