Package Details: linux-ck 6.12.1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-ck.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-ck
Description: The Linux kernel and modules with ck's hrtimer patches
Upstream URL: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Provides: KSMBD-MODULE, VIRTUALBOX-GUEST-MODULES, WIREGUARD-MODULE
Replaces: virtualbox-guest-modules-arch, wireguard-arch
Submitter: graysky
Maintainer: graysky
Last Packager: graysky
Votes: 459
Popularity: 0.24
First Submitted: 2011-07-22 14:51 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-23 13:58 (UTC)

Dependencies (14)

Required by (7)

Sources (6)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 .. 308 Next › Last »

graysky commented on 2014-12-14 03:05 (UTC)

While we wait the ARCH devs to create a proper PKGBUILD for 3.18.0, I have pieced together one for those wishing to test out the package in the following directory of repo-ck: http://repo-ck.com/PKG_source/next Note that I have simply done a `make oldconfig` against 3.17.6-1's config files and selected the modules for new features unless that wasn't an option in which case I went with the upstream defaults for new features. Also know that I am noting planning to do an early update to the accompanying packages (broadcom, nvidia*, and vbox*) so if you have a system that depends on them, you will have to modify them yourself until 3.18.x-1-ARCH goes live. Enjoy!

graysky commented on 2014-12-11 18:19 (UTC)

Got em. Just need to wait for the ARCH dev team to push their config and PKGBUILD etc. into svn. I unflagged it; please flag it out of date again once 3.18-1 is disclosed[1]. 1. https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/log/trunk?h=packages/linux

theaifam5 commented on 2014-12-11 17:16 (UTC)

http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/3.0/3.18/3.18-ck1/ http://algo.ing.unimo.it/people/paolo/disk_sched/patches/3.18.0-v7r6/

sir_lucjan commented on 2014-12-11 09:52 (UTC)

http://ck-hack.blogspot.de/2014/12/bfs-460-linux-318-ck1.html

graysky commented on 2014-12-11 00:20 (UTC)

Samsagax - why out of date?

clfarron4 commented on 2014-12-10 12:28 (UTC)

@AnAkkk: There's also the issue about which extra kernels should be provided in the main ArchLinux repositories (which is always a fun one).

graysky commented on 2014-12-09 21:08 (UTC)

Did that a while back and was not voted in; limited time for it now... what's wrong with [repo-ck]? I have been maintaining it since 2011. See the wiki page for more if you haven't already.

AnAkkk commented on 2014-12-09 21:03 (UTC)

Can't you ask to become a TU and do that yourself ? :)

graysky commented on 2014-12-09 20:54 (UTC)

Oh... that's not up to me. I believe a TU would need to adopt the package and bring it in toe [community]. No way would he or she build all the CPU versions that I supply in [repo-ck] though...

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 .. 308 Next › Last »