Package Details: linux-ck 6.12.1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-ck.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-ck
Description: The Linux kernel and modules with ck's hrtimer patches
Upstream URL: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Provides: KSMBD-MODULE, VIRTUALBOX-GUEST-MODULES, WIREGUARD-MODULE
Replaces: virtualbox-guest-modules-arch, wireguard-arch
Submitter: graysky
Maintainer: graysky
Last Packager: graysky
Votes: 459
Popularity: 0.24
First Submitted: 2011-07-22 14:51 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-23 13:58 (UTC)

Dependencies (14)

Required by (7)

Sources (6)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 .. 308 Next › Last »

qpalz commented on 2013-01-04 14:59 (UTC)

@cbowman57 OK, I will make them separate.

cbowman57 commented on 2013-01-04 14:58 (UTC)

I say keep it clean qpalz.

qpalz commented on 2013-01-04 06:31 (UTC)

@graysky I have tried making linux-uksm-ck be able to disable uksm and become linux-ck, but in a very ugly way since if you disable ck or uksm, the kernel suffix remains -uksm-ck. I can only fix this problem in a very ugly way, so I would rather not to use a extremely ugly method to solve a ugly problem. The extremely ugly method is to modify linux-uksm-ck.install linux-uksm-ck.preset dynamically when makepkg is running. But it results in the wrong checksum when you want to rebuild the package. Then a more more more ugly method can be used, that is to change the checksum dynamically... So, is it better not to merge them? What do you think?

<deleted-account> commented on 2013-01-03 14:13 (UTC)

@graysky,thanks.i see.

qpalz commented on 2013-01-03 10:04 (UTC)

@jr0501 I am now maintaining it.

graysky commented on 2013-01-03 10:02 (UTC)

I checked out that patch set a while ago and made the choice not to add it to the package. I am still uninterested. Sorry.

<deleted-account> commented on 2013-01-03 05:08 (UTC)

linux-uksm-ck is orphan,could you merge with it? thanks.

graysky commented on 2012-12-21 12:47 (UTC)

@Thaodan - Yes, that it there to remove extra info from versioning just like in the ARCH kernel's PKGBUILD. If you are curious about it, simply copy the file that it modifies to a new name, run the sed line, then diff the two files. You will see.

Thaodan commented on 2012-12-21 02:28 (UTC)

Im' updating my modifed linux-pf PKGBUILD (added propper package-naming description) and addded some changes that you done to your PKGBUILD (for example docs, turn of NUMA). And I found 'sed -ri "s|^(EXTRAVERSION =).*|\1 -${pkgrel}|" Makefile' in your PKGBUILD, for what is it?

graysky commented on 2012-12-21 02:09 (UTC)

Bump to v3.7.1-3 Changelog: Added ARCH fix or watchdog regression, see: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/33095 Commit: http://pkgbuild.com/git/aur-mirror.git/commit/linux-ck?id=bc06b904a8d071e0549217dcdafe47f9e0eba5b7

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 .. 308 Next › Last »