I think it won't be any different than the stock arch kernel in that aspect.
Try it and see if you like it.
Search Criteria
Package Details: linux-lqx-headers 6.12.8.lqx1-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-lqx.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | linux-lqx |
Description: | Headers and scripts for building modules for the Linux Liquorix kernel |
Upstream URL: | https://liquorix.net/ |
Keywords: | bbr2 bfq futex pds proton zen |
Licenses: | GPL-2.0-only |
Submitter: | akurei |
Maintainer: | sir_lucjan (damentz) |
Last Packager: | damentz |
Votes: | 161 |
Popularity: | 0.75 |
First Submitted: | 2011-08-08 16:08 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2025-01-03 03:03 (UTC) |
Dependencies (13)
- linux-lqxAUR
- pahole (pahole-gitAUR)
- bc (bc-ghAUR) (make)
- cpio (cpio-gitAUR) (make)
- gettext (gettext-gitAUR) (make)
- git (git-gitAUR, git-glAUR) (make)
- libelf (elfutils-gitAUR) (make)
- pahole (pahole-gitAUR) (make)
- perl (perl-gitAUR) (make)
- python (python37AUR, python311AUR, python310AUR) (make)
- tar (tar-gitAUR, busybox-coreutilsAUR) (make)
- xz (xz-gitAUR) (make)
- zstd (zstd-gitAUR, zstd-staticAUR) (make)
Required by (0)
Sources (3)
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 .. 121 Next › Last »
shivik commented on 2012-03-31 04:51 (UTC)
shadowed87 commented on 2012-03-30 15:14 (UTC)
is this kernel suitable for a laptop aswell?? i mean about power management...are there any drawbacks?
shivik commented on 2012-03-15 05:49 (UTC)
No.You don't need to change anything to build for x86_64.
If you're running x86_64 it will build for x86_64 and produce a 64-bit binary
Don't worry about it.
KARCH=x86 means "pc paltform" in this case(does not define 32 or 64 bit).
It just tells the script to use the correct kernel sources.
<deleted-account> commented on 2012-03-15 00:39 (UTC)
So to build this for x86_64 all I need to do is change KARCH to "x86_64" in the PKGBUILD?
Freso commented on 2012-02-29 14:07 (UTC)
Like graysky's. But it looks like AUR is already in a Git repos, so I guess I can just clone this from there. :)
shivik commented on 2012-02-28 21:04 (UTC)
You mean like graysky's PKG build commits here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50911
Or the liquorix patches that damentz does?
Freso commented on 2012-02-28 19:49 (UTC)
Is the development of this PKGBUILD going on in a Git repository anywhere by chance?
shivik commented on 2012-02-22 06:11 (UTC)
Updated to 3.2.7-1.
config files are the same as 3.2.6-1 at the time I update the PKGBUILD.
I don't know if damentz is going to update those or leave them the same for 3.2.7-1
In case he updates you'll get
config.i386 ... FAILED
config.amd64 ... FAILED
until I update the PKGBUILD again.
shivik commented on 2012-02-15 05:38 (UTC)
config files were updated again
shivik commented on 2012-02-06 22:26 (UTC)
Updated checksums.
I should probably bump package version too,but that will brake the sync with the lqx patch...
Pinned Comments
damentz commented on 2020-08-31 15:22 (UTC) (edited on 2021-12-21 18:25 (UTC) by damentz)
Official binaries of linux-lqx, linux-lqx-headers, and linux-lqx-docs are now available: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Unofficial_user_repositories#liquorix
Signing key import instructions:
sudo pacman-key --keyserver hkps://keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys 9AE4078033F8024D && sudo pacman-key --lsign-key 9AE4078033F8024D