Package Details: linux-lqx 6.11.10.lqx1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-lqx.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-lqx
Description: The Linux Liquorix kernel and modules
Upstream URL: https://liquorix.net/
Keywords: bbr2 bfq futex pds proton zen
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Provides: UKSMD-BUILTIN, VHBA-MODULE, VIRTUALBOX-GUEST-MODULES, WIREGUARD-MODULE
Submitter: akurei
Maintainer: sir_lucjan (damentz)
Last Packager: damentz
Votes: 161
Popularity: 1.70
First Submitted: 2011-08-08 16:08 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-22 16:37 (UTC)

Dependencies (19)

Required by (12)

Sources (3)

Pinned Comments

damentz commented on 2020-08-31 15:22 (UTC) (edited on 2021-12-21 18:25 (UTC) by damentz)

Official binaries of linux-lqx, linux-lqx-headers, and linux-lqx-docs are now available: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Unofficial_user_repositories#liquorix

Signing key import instructions: sudo pacman-key --keyserver hkps://keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys 9AE4078033F8024D && sudo pacman-key --lsign-key 9AE4078033F8024D

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 Next › Last »

<deleted-account> commented on 2011-12-04 06:03 (UTC)

But how can you take over when this RcrdBrt guy is nowhere to be found? Maybe we should signal the archlinux staff?

<deleted-account> commented on 2011-12-04 01:09 (UTC)

I've got everything updated and tested and ready to upload.

<deleted-account> commented on 2011-12-04 00:38 (UTC)

I'm in the process of creating the updated PKG Build and I will be taking over the maintenance of the package for the time being.

akurei commented on 2011-12-03 20:34 (UTC)

3.1.4-1 has been released by LQX now =)

<deleted-account> commented on 2011-12-02 22:48 (UTC)

A 3.1.4-1 patch of lqx has not been released yet, once it is I will work on getting an updated version.

<deleted-account> commented on 2011-12-02 18:25 (UTC)

Yeah, linux-lqx is a good kernel and doesn't deserve this. Maybe this guy clicked on "Adopt packages" by accident?

silvik commented on 2011-12-02 13:13 (UTC)

hey Mavirick / td123 / someone with sufficient skills and time, why don't you take ownership of this package or create linux-liquorix or something like this and maintain it properly? it's already 2 versions behind official arch kernel. the maintainer doesn't care anyway.

<deleted-account> commented on 2011-11-30 07:07 (UTC)

Thanks,Mavirick! Too bad the _new_ maintainer doesn't seem to care. It's been 3 days since lqx 3.1.3 is out and still no update.

<deleted-account> commented on 2011-11-30 06:47 (UTC)

I've created and tested a new pkgbuild for linux-lqx-3.1.3-1 it requires the new mkinitcpio 0.8 which moves mkinitcpio from /sbin/ to /usr/bin Here is the PKGBUILD: http://pastebin.com/TeySHHRs Here is the Modified linux-lqx.install: http://pastebin.com/bdiyFB51

shivik commented on 2011-11-23 07:13 (UTC)

td123, what I meant was that you can use a different name for your kernel for ex. linux-td123, linux-td, linux-lqxtd (and still base it on the -lqx)- you get my point. I believe in diversity so I welcome your unique approach, but still I don't think linux-lqx should be changed. That's why I suggested a new AUR package.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 Next › Last »