Package Details: linux-next-git 20250403.r0.gf0a16f536332-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-next-git.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-next-git
Description: The Linux NEXT kernel and modules
Upstream URL: http://www.kernel.org/
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Provides: KSMBD-MODULE, VIRTUALBOX-GUEST-MODULES, WIREGUARD-MODULE
Submitter: Nefelim4ag
Maintainer: ptr1337 (gromit)
Last Packager: ptr1337
Votes: 18
Popularity: 0.79
First Submitted: 2014-10-12 19:04 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-04-03 17:24 (UTC)

Dependencies (20)

Required by (8)

Sources (5)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next › Last »

denspirit commented on 2013-09-11 22:05 (UTC)

Made this PKGBUILD work in half of a day. Essential variables $_builddir and $_sourcedir contain empty values, because of inexistense of $srcdir and $pkgdir before build() starts. I am posting my edited version of PKGBUILD, but it contains lots of dirty hacks to get everything working by now, and .install and .preset files are unmodified. http://pastebin.com/quHA607j

cpatrick08 commented on 2012-10-11 06:55 (UTC)

in linux-next/src/linux-next/scripts/depmod.sh

ilikenwf commented on 2012-10-11 01:47 (UTC)

Erm...can you look in the source directory and tell me where depmod.sh is, please? The full path relative to $(SRCDIR)

cpatrick08 commented on 2012-10-10 17:18 (UTC)

cant install kernel get following error message -> Skipping tree update... sed: can't read scripts/depmod.sh: No such file or directory

ilikenwf commented on 2012-09-14 08:05 (UTC)

Pretty sure that one was owned, but not updated when I created this one. If a TU wants to delete the other one and rename this one, that's fine.

techlive commented on 2012-08-29 19:24 (UTC)

@ilikenwf This is acctually a git package, thus it should be named as linux-next-git which has already existed in the [aur](https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49614) and been orphaned, why not just pick up and maintain it rather than creating a package which does not follow the Arch Package Naming conventions?