Search Criteria
Package Details: lsyncd 2.3.1-9
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/lsyncd.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | lsyncd |
Description: | Live Syncing (Mirror) Daemon |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/lsyncd/lsyncd |
Licenses: | GPL-2.0-or-later |
Submitter: | djgera |
Maintainer: | carsme |
Last Packager: | carsme |
Votes: | 67 |
Popularity: | 0.005152 |
First Submitted: | 2009-03-25 20:03 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-03-03 16:48 (UTC) |
Dependencies (7)
- glibc (glibc-gitAUR, glibc-linux4AUR, glibc-eacAUR, glibc-eac-binAUR, glibc-eac-rocoAUR)
- lua53
- rsync (rsync-gitAUR, rsync-reflinkAUR, rsync-reflink-gitAUR)
- asciidoc (asciidoc-gitAUR) (make)
- cmake (cmake-gitAUR) (make)
- lua53-posix (lua53-posix-gitAUR) (check)
- openssh (openssh-gitAUR, openssh-dotconfigAUR, openssh-dotconfig-binAUR, openssh-selinuxAUR, openssh-hpn-shimAUR, openssh-gssapiAUR) (check)
Latest Comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 8 Next › Last »
cqql commented on 2024-11-16 12:54 (UTC)
Why do I need to wait for what feels like forever for some test suite to run on installing this? Installation should not take more than a few seconds and not run a several minutes long test suite mandatorily.
brauliobo commented on 2024-03-16 20:08 (UTC)
I had to create /etc/lsyncd and /var/log/lsyncd directories, which should have been created by the package?
carsme commented on 2024-01-31 07:34 (UTC)
@la1den Definitely, makes sense to me. Changed in
2.3.1-8
.la1den commented on 2024-01-29 14:27 (UTC)
The ProtectHome option in the lsyncd.service file is enabled by default, which prevents the service from accessing home directories. However, most users may need to sync files within their home directories. Therefore, wouldn't it be better to remove this option?
carsme commented on 2024-01-19 16:42 (UTC)
@flaviut, Great suggestion, fixed in
2.3.1-7
. Thanks!flaviut commented on 2024-01-19 15:09 (UTC)
On my system, I have CMake default to Ninja, so this package doesn't build right. Easy fix though:
carsme commented on 2024-01-19 09:47 (UTC)
I seem to be mistaken, the tests only take 10 minutes for me, which I think is acceptable. Still, if you have suggestions to reduce the test time, I'm open to hear them :)
carsme commented on 2024-01-19 08:57 (UTC)
@mmlenz, I prefer to run at least some tests to verify the functionality, but I agree that the whole suite takes incredibly long time (~1 hour for me). Do you have any suggestion on how to speed it up? Or, if we were to run a smaller selection of tests, which tests should we skip?
mmlenz commented on 2024-01-17 18:22 (UTC)
These new tests are a bit excessive. They just run and run. Never seen a package take this long to build just running a test suite.
carsme commented on 2023-08-07 17:24 (UTC) (edited on 2023-08-10 06:54 (UTC) by carsme)
Just pushed an update with two significant changes:
lsyncd
) with some hardening enabled.There is a risk this is broken for some users or affects some use-cases. Let me know if you experience any problems.
1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 8 Next › Last »