Package Details: luxmark 4.0alpha1-9

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/luxmark.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: luxmark
Description: OpenCL benchmark tool
Upstream URL: https://github.com/LuxCoreRender/LuxMark
Licenses: GPL3
Submitter: Barthalion
Maintainer: DarkShadow44
Last Packager: DarkShadow44
Votes: 5
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2018-01-06 20:59 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-04-19 01:34 (UTC)

Dependencies (20)

Required by (0)

Sources (5)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5

DarkShadow44 commented on 2019-01-13 17:54 (UTC)

See my comment at https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eos_portable_archive/, you need to downgrade libarchive. There is some regression.

Stebs commented on 2019-01-13 17:23 (UTC)

Fails for me with the eos_portable_archive dependency:

==> Überprüfe source Dateien mit sha256sums... epa.zip ... Durchgelaufen ==> Entferne existierendes $srcdir/ Verzeichnis... ==> Entpacke Quellen... -> Entpacke epa.zip mit bsdtar ==> Beginne prepare()... bsdtar: Error opening archive: Failed to open 'sourceCode\sourceCode.zip' ==> FEHLER: Ein Fehler geschah in prepare(). Breche ab...

DarkShadow44 commented on 2019-01-12 12:53 (UTC)

I've migrated luxmark to use the newer luxcorerender instead of luxrays ( luxrays-hg).

Should be fixed now - can you please retest? It's a fairly big change and I'm not 100% sure about the dependencies. Also, would you mind testing if it works properly? I'm using amdgpu and it currently gives me a freeze during testing.

Score_Under commented on 2019-01-12 04:43 (UTC)

Fails to build, giving the error: SLG Library not found.

enihcam commented on 2018-12-12 23:29 (UTC)

Please depend on 'opencl-driver', instead of specified optional opencl drivers.

City-busz commented on 2018-01-07 22:05 (UTC)

Reported bug: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/53797

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5