Search Criteria
Package Details: mailspring-bin 1.14.0-2
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/mailspring-bin.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | mailspring-bin |
Description: | A beautiful, fast and fully open source mail client.Prebuilt version.Use system-wide electron. |
Upstream URL: | https://getmailspring.com/ |
Keywords: | electron email imap mail |
Licenses: | GPL-3.0-only |
Conflicts: | mailspring |
Provides: | mailspring |
Submitter: | zxp19821005 |
Maintainer: | zxp19821005 |
Last Packager: | zxp19821005 |
Votes: | 208 |
Popularity: | 1.01 |
First Submitted: | 2024-07-10 05:38 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-10-10 04:07 (UTC) |
Dependencies (3)
- db5.3
- electron30 (electron30-binAUR)
- krb5 (krb5-gitAUR)
Latest Comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 27 Next › Last »
zxp19821005 commented on 2024-10-10 04:10 (UTC) (edited on 2024-10-10 04:10 (UTC) by zxp19821005)
@Th30 This package was built from
electron30
, so I just keep the necessary files and use the system-wide electron which may have been installed.zxp19821005 commented on 2024-10-10 04:07 (UTC)
@FabioLolix Thanks for your suggestion, fixed it.
Th30 commented on 2024-10-09 23:18 (UTC)
I confirm that openssl-1.0 is not required. This dependency stops me from installing the package :/ I removed this dependency and the package is now installed correctly.
I have another question, if it's a binary package, why use electron? Isn't the package already compiled?
FabioLolix commented on 2024-10-09 16:15 (UTC)
@zxp19821005
openssl-1.0
is not needed to at least launch the program@skylab no, electron30 is in the Arch repo, if you wanna use electron30-bin just install that
skylab commented on 2024-10-07 06:21 (UTC) (edited on 2024-10-07 06:22 (UTC) by skylab)
It would be better to use dependency "electron30-bin" instead of "electron30" by default
Muflone commented on 2024-10-05 15:56 (UTC) (edited on 2024-10-05 15:56 (UTC) by Muflone)
@mandeepsan this binary package is a duplicate of mailspring-bin, so a merge request would move all the votes and comments to the mailspring-bin package and delete this package
this package name is more suited for a source based package built from this PKGBUILD
if you don't want to maintain the package to use sources then a merge request will be filed and this package will be migrated into mailspring-bin, leaving the mailsprint package name available for anyone else wanting to maintain the package from the sources
Muflone commented on 2024-09-28 22:03 (UTC)
@mandeepsan please build this package from sources or either merge it with mailspring-bin
Sving1024 commented on 2024-09-28 13:04 (UTC)
Sorry for that. I simply found the
build()
function and said that.zxp19821005 commented on 2024-09-18 22:25 (UTC)
@Sving1024 This package was a binary release.
Sving1024 commented on 2024-09-16 06:11 (UTC)
The package is built from sources and should not use the
-bin
suffix. Would it be better to swap the PKGBUILD with packagemailspring
?1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 27 Next › Last »