Package Details: masterpdfeditor 5.9.86-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/masterpdfeditor.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: masterpdfeditor
Description: A complete solution for viewing, creating and editing PDF files
Upstream URL: https://code-industry.net/free-pdf-editor/
Keywords: master-pdf-editor
Licenses: custom
Submitter: farseerfc
Maintainer: pgoetz
Last Packager: pgoetz
Votes: 190
Popularity: 0.039717
First Submitted: 2016-12-05 01:50 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-04 16:49 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

Alad commented on 2021-03-03 16:25 (UTC)

The next person who discusses keygens will have their account suspended indefinitely.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 .. 30 Next › Last »

pgoetz commented on 2022-06-16 19:07 (UTC)

@m8D2 I wasn't aware that a single PKGBUILD could be used for different architectures? Let me look in to this and if feasible, will do. I'm kind of swamped at this moment, but will look in to this in the next 2 weeks.

m8D2 commented on 2022-06-13 18:17 (UTC) (edited on 2022-06-13 18:17 (UTC) by m8D2)

Hi @pgoetz

Could you please add ARM version to the source() as well:

For arm64:

master-pdf-editor-5.8.46-qt5.arm64.tar.gz

https://code-industry.net/free-pdf-editor/#get

Thanks!

demolitions commented on 2022-04-29 08:11 (UTC)

@DAC324 I can confirm licenses do not transfer across major upgrades, that is the word of Code Industry support team, but if you ask them, they will send you links to download the last version on which your license is valid, you then only have to grab or write the correct PKGBUILD for that version.

DAC324 commented on 2022-04-28 12:47 (UTC)

@pgoetz Thanks for clarifying. Looks like I will have to have another look. Possibly, there are differences between the online activation and the keys for offline activation that were available for purchase formerly.

pgoetz commented on 2022-04-27 19:46 (UTC)

@DAC324 I've only ever purchased one license which has continued to work across multiple upgrades. Maybe the license doesn't survive a major release update? Say going from version 4.x.x. to version 5.x.x?

DAC324 commented on 2022-04-27 16:13 (UTC) (edited on 2022-04-27 17:32 (UTC) by DAC324)

Just curious: Does the online activation of this program survive a version upgrade?

I am asking this because I purchased an offline activation key long time ago for Master PDF Editor 5.6 which became invalid as a new version of Master PDF Editor (5.7) was released so I had to buy it again which was a bit annoying. I guess it is comprehensible that I do not want to buy new keys again and again :)

nursoda commented on 2022-04-06 18:40 (UTC)

Yes, I had qt5-declarative installed since that is used by many KDE applications (like okular, spectacle, khelpcenter, dolphin). Thus, KDE Plasma users will probably not have been affected.

Harvey commented on 2022-04-06 18:04 (UTC)

@pgoetz: Nope, I guess this is a new dependency brought in by the new version 5.8.46 of masterpdfeditor. The last version worked without qt5-declarative. I suspect 'Added floating pop up panel for comments.' from the last changelog, but I am only guessing ;) Anyway, thanks for the change and keep up the good work!

pgoetz commented on 2022-04-06 15:22 (UTC) (edited on 2022-04-06 15:22 (UTC) by pgoetz)

I wonder if the qt5 packagers modified dependencies, or if this is just a long standing issue that no one had run in to before.

pacman -Qi qt5-declarative

shows

Required By     : ki18n  kid3-qt  qt5-graphicaleffects  qt5-location
                  qt5-quickcontrols2  qt5-wayland  qt5-webchannel

I have Krita installed on my system, which depends on ki18n, which then pulls in qt5-declarative. Anyway, I added qt5-declarative as a package dependency.

Harvey commented on 2022-04-06 14:18 (UTC) (edited on 2022-04-06 14:19 (UTC) by Harvey)

@nursoda: I guess you already had installed 'qt5-declarative'? What does 'pacman -Qs qt5-declarative' say? If not, If you have /usr/bin/libQt5Qml.so.5 in your system, I'd be interested in what 'pacman -Qo /usr/bin/libQt5Qml.so.5' says which package owns this lib. To be clear: I only suggest to extend the depends-Array in the PKGBUILD by 'qt5-declarative' because the installation of this package fixed the issue for me.