Package Details: mutter-performance 1:47.4-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/mutter-performance.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: mutter-performance
Description: A window manager for GNOME | Attempts to improve performances with non-upstreamed merge-requests and frequent stable branch resync
Upstream URL: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter
Licenses: GPL-2.0-or-later
Groups: gnome
Conflicts: mutter
Provides: libmutter-15.so, mutter
Submitter: Terence
Maintainer: Terence (Saren, saltyming)
Last Packager: saltyming
Votes: 78
Popularity: 0.079402
First Submitted: 2019-07-09 09:35 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-01-15 11:01 (UTC)

Required by (16)

Sources (4)

Pinned Comments

saltyming commented on 2022-03-22 09:37 (UTC) (edited on 2024-10-22 08:27 (UTC) by saltyming)

If you have a problem during any system update with mutter-performance & gnome-shell-performance, please install mutter & gnome-shell packages from the main repository and do full upgrade first, then build the performance packages later.

If you are using [gnome-unstable] and [extra-testing] repositories, use mutter-performance-unstable

The default patch list includes "Dynamic triple buffering(!1441)", "text-input-v1(!3751)".

Latest Dynamic triple buffering patch has several included MRs from the main development branch to achieve maximum performance.

To enable a specific MR in the Merge Requests List, add an line "_merge_requests_to_use+=('<MR number>')" at the end of PKGBUILD. (Because if you edit the line directly you can be able to end up with merge conflict upon updates.)

You can see some patches' git history here: https://git.saltyming.net/sungmg/mutter-performance-source/

Saren commented on 2018-08-30 14:52 (UTC) (edited on 2020-10-06 05:50 (UTC) by Saren)

If you are getting errors like fatal: bad revision '73e8cf32' while building this package, refer to PKGBUILD and see which patches caused this. Then, go to the related URLs, replace the commit hashes. If there are conflicts, comment out the patches.

Please notify me in comment section if this happens.

The optional performance patches are by default enabled.

A package for gnome-shell performance patches: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-performance/

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 .. 64 Next › Last »

glorious-yellow commented on 2022-06-30 21:24 (UTC)

!1441 on GNOME 42 has been moved:

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/2487

saltyming commented on 2022-05-22 01:09 (UTC)

@kal I can't confirm intel but I think it does improve performance on X11/Nvidia.

kal commented on 2022-05-21 22:33 (UTC)

Does this patch still work on X11/Intel ? For me, on Wayland - silky smooth but X11 is stuttery :-(

Thanks in advance!

saltyming commented on 2022-05-20 11:53 (UTC)

@allexj It depends on performance of your machine.

allexj commented on 2022-05-15 17:17 (UTC)

This package does not help fixing the animation lag (reported here: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/3760 )

saltyming commented on 2022-05-04 07:50 (UTC)

@gandalfmagic Done.

gandalfmagic commented on 2022-05-03 17:33 (UTC) (edited on 2022-05-03 17:34 (UTC) by gandalfmagic)

Hi, this update (42.0+r93+g5e5480e62-1) breaks the mouse cursor on some configurations (mostly nvidia with wayland gbm it seems).

Here is the issue on the bug-tracker: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues/2250

This MR should solve the problem: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/2397

Thank you

saltyming commented on 2022-05-03 14:41 (UTC)

@kal I think it's because gnome itself is getting faster than before. It still boosts performance in my low-spec machine.

You can also try gnome-shell-performance to see if this works for you too.

kal commented on 2022-05-03 14:33 (UTC)

First of all thanks so much guys for your work on this package it makes such a difference day-to-day!

Anyway, after upgrading to Gnome 42, mutter-performance appears to build and install fine. However, in use, it seems to make no difference?! Under Gnome 41, silky smooth but with Gnome 42 it's almost as if the patch is not being applied at all - strange.

Do you think I am doing something wrong? Any help would be appreciated.

Thank you.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 .. 64 Next › Last »