Package Details: netatalk 4.0.5-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/netatalk.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: netatalk
Description: Open-source implementation of the Apple Filing Protocol
Upstream URL: https://netatalk.io
Keywords: afp apple mac macos
Licenses: GPL-2.0-or-later
Conflicts: netatalk-ddp, netatalk2
Submitter: Snowman
Maintainer: denn
Last Packager: denn
Votes: 99
Popularity: 0.21
First Submitted: 2007-03-31 06:19 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-10 20:38 (UTC)

Dependencies (26)

Required by (0)

Sources (1)

Pinned Comments

denn commented on 2024-10-07 09:59 (UTC) (edited on 2024-10-20 12:31 (UTC) by denn)

As version 4.0.0-1 switched to db5.3 as suggested by product documentation. This will make cnid_bdb to re-create all db files after upgrade.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 .. 25 Next › Last »

SJ_UnderWater commented on 2012-04-10 18:49 (UTC)

i hadn't expected yaourt to build the package. if used "normally" with makepkg, only netatalk will be built by default without any issues, netatalk-ddp will only be built if specified by itself (as in the wiki entry). I'll have to examine yaourt and see what I can do to prevent it from building both at the same time

teek commented on 2012-04-10 12:05 (UTC)

I used Yaourt to install the package put it also gives the below mentioned errors. You say: "leave dpp out" but how do you do that and prevent the: "/usr/share/man/man8/afpd.8.gz exists in both 'netatalk' and 'netatalk-ddp'" Errors? Do I have to edit the PKGBUILD? What should I change exactly?

emphire commented on 2012-04-09 22:23 (UTC)

Thanks SJ. I didn't realize there was a new wiki entry. It was very easy to follow and I'm up and running now.

SJ_UnderWater commented on 2012-04-09 18:06 (UTC)

you're only supposed to install _one_. did you check the wiki entry for netatalk? If you don't need ddp, leave it out.

emphire commented on 2012-04-09 17:57 (UTC)

I get the following errors and lots of similar errors for other files when trying to install the package: Targets (2): netatalk-2.2.2-3 netatalk-ddp-2.2.2-3 Total Installed Size: 6.06 MiB Net Upgrade Size: 1.68 MiB Proceed with installation? [Y/n] (2/2) checking package integrity [############################] 100% (2/2) loading package files [############################] 100% (2/2) checking for file conflicts [############################] 100% error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) /etc/netatalk/AppleVolumes.default exists in both 'netatalk' and 'netatalk-ddp' /etc/netatalk/AppleVolumes.system exists in both 'netatalk' and 'netatalk-ddp' /etc/netatalk/afp_ldap.conf exists in both 'netatalk' and 'netatalk-ddp' /etc/netatalk/afpd.conf exists in both 'netatalk' and 'netatalk-ddp' /etc/netatalk/netatalk.conf exists in both 'netatalk' and 'netatalk-ddp' /etc/pam.d/netatalk exists in both 'netatalk' and 'netatalk-ddp' [...]

munkoil commented on 2012-04-08 09:25 (UTC)

Thanks, I'm not familiar with split packages. I saw the missing ' when adding more dependancies to the depends variable but didn't know the resolve_deps command. Now it builds and so far it works like a charm. Will test it further and come back to you if I find anything.

SJ_UnderWater commented on 2012-04-08 08:44 (UTC)

should be fine now, was a split-package incompatibility

munkoil commented on 2012-04-08 06:49 (UTC)

Hi again, Some trouble building and I can't find the problem ==> Entering fakeroot environment... /usr/bin/makepkg: eval: line 1505: syntax error near unexpected token `(' /usr/bin/makepkg: eval: line 1505: `provides_list+=netatalk _options=`echo $_options | sed s/disable/enable/g` build_netatalk } package_netatalk() {' ==> Starting package_netatalk()... -> Building... make: *** No rule to make target `install'. Stop. ==> ERROR: A failure occurred in package_netatalk(). Aborting...

munkoil commented on 2012-04-08 06:27 (UTC)

Hi, Great that you will try to get it accepted into the community repository. When I unzipped the tarball I noticed that all files have execute permission. This is not correct as far as I know. No files need this before they are installed in their final location.

SJ_UnderWater commented on 2012-04-08 03:48 (UTC)

any testing feedback would be greatly appreciated

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 .. 25 Next › Last »