Package Details: netextender 10.2.850-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/netextender.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: netextender
Description: SonicWALL SSL VPN Client
Upstream URL: https://www.sonicwall.com/en-us/products/remote-access/vpn-client
Keywords: dell netextender sonicwall ssl sslvpn vpn
Licenses: custom
Submitter: None
Maintainer: techge
Last Packager: techge
Votes: 30
Popularity: 0.61
First Submitted: 2010-07-02 22:09 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2023-08-09 07:44 (UTC)

Dependencies (4)

Required by (0)

Sources (3)

Pinned Comments

physkets commented on 2021-02-10 15:33 (UTC)

In case of changes/updates to ppp, you will need to re-run chmod -v u+s /usr/sbin/pppd.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 .. 11 Next › Last »

gilvbp commented on 2021-08-22 23:02 (UTC)

I got this error: --- SonicWALL NetExtender 10.2.826 Installer --- ERROR: This copy of NetExtender is intended for 32-bit systems. Please install a copy of the 64-bit version of NetExtender. --- SonicWALL NetExtender 10.2.826 Installer --- Downloaded the NetExtender.Linux-10.2.826.x86_64.tgz, and I'm on a x64.

physkets commented on 2021-02-10 15:33 (UTC)

In case of changes/updates to ppp, you will need to re-run chmod -v u+s /usr/sbin/pppd.

physkets commented on 2021-01-27 14:06 (UTC)

Thanks a lot, @KavalirOS

<deleted-account> commented on 2021-01-27 07:44 (UTC)

Source: source_x86_64=("NetExtender-${pkgver}.x86_64.tgz::https://software.sonicwall.com/NetExtender/NetExtender.Linux-${pkgver}.x86_64.tgz"

is better then the link to a unversioned demo version in my opinion

supa_user commented on 2021-01-04 14:57 (UTC)

817 is out, but the 817 version posted at the URL listed in sources is exactly the same as 816. The version on MySonicWALL is different and matches the md5sum they post there.

@EarthMind - yes, I'm getting errors with Sectigo certs also. I thought it was just me. None of my browsers take issues hitting the same URLs either.

alexleach commented on 2020-11-20 09:12 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for the reply. Ok, fair enough. Looks like java-runtime is a tiny package and only includes policytool and a few libraries: libjsound, libjsoundalsa and libsplashscreen. Everything else is provided by its dependency on jre8-openjdk-headless. But I agree, it makes more sense to depend on the non-headless version, in case the GUI components get moved from '-headless' to jre8-openjdk.

Re: net-tools, okay. NetExtender works fine for me without it, but yes there could be other SSL VPN set-ups where it is required, and it's difficult to test every case on a single set-up.

physkets commented on 2020-11-19 10:43 (UTC)

If it uses Java for its GUI, then it doesn't make sense that it works without the full java-runtime, and just the headless version. Are you sure you don't have another version of OpenJDK or some other provider installed?

net-tools was already a dependency when I inherited this repo, and I never really checked. Maybe there is something in netExtender that assumes the existence of one of the tools. I don't want to remove it and risk breaking some corner-case functionality.

alexleach commented on 2020-11-19 09:56 (UTC)

Hi, does this actually need java-runtime and net-tools as dependencies? I've just removed both from the depends lists, installed and both the GUI and the CLI seem to run fine.

Instead of java-runtime, I've got java-runtime-common and jre8-openjdk-headless installed, so I guess java-runtime-common suffices on its own?

Not sure what is required from net-tools, but netextender seems to run fine without it?

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 .. 11 Next › Last »